Why young Russians don't like the current government

[Universe]

[Rumata]

For the comprador nature of it.

Also social lifts are very limited.

[Rumata]

But the foreign satanists try to make sure the youth doesn't like it even more to make a more direct rule of this territory possible.

[KirillMazur]

- The antipode of the concept of "effective management".
- Because of betraying the results of the victory in WW2 and the achievements of the Revolution.
- Because of tacit acceptance of the current place in the world division of labor.
- Because of submissive position to "international" organizations.
- Because of imposing values alien to Russians.

[KirillMazur]

You can add here:
- attempts to rewrite history to please the West.
- rejection of the "leap into the future" at the turn of the 60-70s (yes, we have the same power since then), instead becoming a resource appendage supporting the life of the western debtonomics.
- blurring of the image of the future, lack of plans for the future, life only for the sake of current benefits.

Perhaps now the situation has begun to change for the better, but until I see the demolition of the monument to Solzhenitsyn and the closure of the Yeltsin Center, I will not believe in the propaganda of positive changes.

[TheGoldenSon]

You can add here:
- attempts to rewrite history to please the West.
- rejection of the "leap into the future" at the turn of the 60-70s (yes, we have the same power since then), instead becoming a resource appendage supporting the life of the western debtonomics.
- blurring of the image of the future, lack of plans for the future, life only for the sake of current benefits.

Perhaps now the situation has begun to change for the better, but until I see the demolition of the monument to Solzhenitsyn and the closure of the Yeltsin Center, I will not believe in the propaganda of positive changes.

Why such hate against Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn? He is one of the bravest Russians to have existed.

[KirillMazur]

Why such hate against Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn? He is one of the bravest Russians to have existed.

The Russian government (or rather, one of the towers of Russian power) idolizes Solzhenitsyn, being the descendants of the Trotskyists who destroyed the USSR, receiving guidance from the CIA, whose project was also Solzhenitsyn.

Spoiler!

If we replace the USSR in the works of Solzhenitsyn with Europe, the USA, and Bandera's Ukraine, everything will fall into place! Snitching? Yes, in Europe and the United States, this has long been the NORM, and in Ukraine - entertainment. Torture? Have you heard about Guantanamo? Executions? Do you know what American cops doing? So there is not even a "Stalinist troika", but simply "it seemed to them, that's why they shot." Although what could have seemed to a policeman who came to a call to a nursing home, where the old man, at 95, refused to eat porridge? But they shot that old man!

Recently, a trial against a policeman ended, who, in self-defense, shot seven (!!!) bullets into an American citizen. All the bullets entered from behind: into the legs, buttocks, back. How can you “defend yourself” in order to hit a person from behind seven times? You have already heard about European policemen and how Russian ones are the example of politeness compared to them.

A quarter of the world's prisoners are in the United States. 40% more than China. And I don't need "per capita"; according to this indicator, the United States is also in the lead here, there are 639 prisoners per 100,000 population. Data from the false Wikipedia, and it is not even lying in favor of of Russia. And that's not counting secret prisons or those that do not officially belong to the United States. Imagine how many of such all over the planet.

Let's return to the "bloody KGB" and Stalin. According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, from 1921 to 1953, 2,369,220 people were imprisoned for counter-revolutionary crimes, 642,980 people were shot. I want to remind you: Stalin more or less gained full power in 1937, when he began to get rid of the Bolshevik-Leninists, who staged a bloody terror. This is precisely what the "Western partners" and our Liberals cannot forgive Stalin. Many of those executed were guilty of corruption and economic crimes.

If you compare, today there are about as many prisoners in the United States as they were convicted from 1921 to 1953 in the USSR. In China, thousands of people are shot every year for corruption and all kinds of "enemies of the people". Why isn't anyone yelling about this?

So Solzhenitsyn, it turns out, wrote the truth, but not about the Soviet Union. During the Soviet era, there was a steady population growth. There were different mistakes, especially in the field of consumer goods, but the basis was literate, Stalinist. This Yeltsin should be called a bloody executioner, since under him about 30 million fell into the ground. It is the Ukrainian presidents who should be blamed for the Holodomor: having received a country with 52 million population, they currently have up to 30 million, and according to some sources, between 23 and 25 million.

Western countries are sliding towards Trotskyism, to that pot-headed kind of Bolshevism, which Stalin managed to overcome before the war. From Russia the West needs to receive the flow of LIVE money in the new "Finintern", as well as raw materials at a low price and the absence of an adequate military organization.

The world is again slipping into "take away and divide," phase, Solzhenitsyn also wrote about this. But this is not about the USSR. In the Soviet Union, the starting chances were equal, and your further life depended on your own qualities and abilities. Those who wanted to earn money - worked on weekends, at night, or went to the North. Someone sitting at home complained about the fate and the "bloody KGB". Nothing much has changed. Who wants to, he works like damned, and someone dreams to take everything away and divide.

Solzhenitsyn should be read by adults, this is how democracy works and where the West is heading are understood better. Solzhenitsyn is a project of Western culture, Western ideology. The West has outplayed itself, selling lies about our past to us; West has taken it as a basis for its own future.

Solzhenitsyn is the most negative character in the history of all Russian literature. So he pretended to be Leo Tolstoy, now Leo Tolstoy, rejected from the church, is not honored, but still he is a great man whom the Russian people will always love and remember. And the Russian people will curse Solzhenitsyn. Look on the Internet: from 100 articles about him - 99 are abusive, out of 100 YouTube videos - 99 are critical and negative. This is a man who is cursed by his people. And the fact that the current government (liberal part of it) raises him up on the shield speaks of how it cares about its own people. Solzhenitsyn is their banner, they need him, because without him it will turn out that the current government has nothing but theft. They need something "sacred" - at first there was Academician Sakharov, but he did not fit the role of an icon; Solzhenitsyn is more suitable for ideology. You can't just write: "we are thieves, let us steal quietly"? They need their own ideology, their own "Che Guevara" on the contrary, here Solzhenitsyn is their "Che Guevara" on the contrary.

[Ruggery]

You can add here:
- attempts to rewrite history to please the West.
- rejection of the "leap into the future" at the turn of the 60-70s (yes, we have the same power since then), instead becoming a resource appendage supporting the life of the western debtonomics.
- blurring of the image of the future, lack of plans for the future, life only for the sake of current benefits.

Perhaps now the situation has begun to change for the better, but until I see the demolition of the monument to Solzhenitsyn and the closure of the Yeltsin Center, I will not believe in the propaganda of positive changes.

Do young Russians like communism or are they anti-communists?
I know that being a Russian nationalist is not the same as being a pro-communist, I'm just saying that because many young people from Western countries now tend to become fanatics of communism.

[Dick]

They didn't like their Monarchy either at one point. The grass isn't always greener on the other side.

[KirillMazur]

Do young Russians like communism or are they anti-communists?
I know that being a Russian nationalist is not the same as being a pro-communist, I'm just saying that because many young people from Western countries now tend to become fanatics of communism.

The problem here is not communism / its absence, but that the current regime is anti-sovereign and anti-Russian in general. *ism is secondary in this case. People want the money they earn to stay in the country and go to its development.

With regard to communism in the West and in our country, confusion has been deliberately introduced into the terminology here and there, so that there is no unity among the supporters. In addition, the division of communism in the USSR into periods and branches is not now in the mainstream; the media are trying to present the entire Soviet period as a whole (criminal regime). Neo-Trotskyism with all its "inclusiveness" is now considered to be the communist "mainstream".