All of the Hispanic world including the Philippines is fully Spanish-derived, whoever says otherwise is retarded. I'm aware they are racially divergent and of lower average IQ but that doesn't affect their cultural foundations, Catholic faith and identity. The Maltese are ethnically Phoenician but we consider them European. Canarians are ethnically Berber, and Cypriots are Levantines genetically (reason why OWD brownies like Azbuzz/Corporate_Demolisher insist that Arabs are "Caucasoid/Caucasian" since it makes them closer to Southern Europeans lel).
Poor indo-mestizo is reaching out here.
The colonisation of the Philippines was not carried out as intensively as in Latin America because of the difficult terrain. There are many islands with very complicated geographies, that is why the New Spaniards only settled in the main cities such as Manila or Cavite, so there was not much miscegenation or cultural exchange in all of Philippines beyond religion.
But in Peru, millions still speak Quechua and Aymara. There were geographic barriers in Latin America too (Chile has the Andes to separate it from Argentina and the Atacama to separate it from Bolivia/Peru as an example) that allowed different smaller societies to prosper separately from one another.
Lower class Spanish men race-mixed with local population and as Spanish women were scarce a mixed "criollo" middle class was created. In the case of Peru, this "criollo" class, was found in the coast. In the Andes although race-mixing happened they never had enough Spanish blood to be considered criollos and why they retained an Andean culture mixed with Spanish folk tradition. The Blacks are pretty much segregated to Chincha.
Hispanic is a cultural group that includes people all the way from Mexico to the Philippines. There are even Hispanics in Africa (Equatorial Guinea and Western Sahara). Their cultures are heavily derived from Spain although with strong local indigenous or other foreign influences.
Before Spanish colonialism, Philippines was divided into several kingdoms and were not united. Filipinos in the mainland now are regionalistic, the Tagalogs dislike the Bisayas and Ilokanos, it's like a New Yorker disliking someone from California or Florida. The Hispanic heritage was and is the glue that ties them together.
30% of Tagalog is from Spanish, some from Mexican Spanish of Nahuatl origin such as Zapote, Palenque, Chayote, Tiangguis. From historical records, 70% of Filipinos spoke Spanish as a 1st or 2nd language from the 1890's to 1930's, now it's less than 2%.
American accounts during their occupation often said that they had to learn Spanish to speak with the locals and basically live there.
But they all have Portuguese ancestry. Goans who were born during the Portuguese rule are still eligible to obtain Portuguese citizenship even today. Portuguese-Goan cultural elements (Natal/Christmas, Kaju feni (originally from Brazil), Vindaloo (de vinha d'alhos from Portugal), Carnival, Sao Joao, Sorpotel (also from Portugal) etc. is still visible in their local customs.
Loads of Indians from Goa have a Portuguese surname. The Portuguese had the weirdest ideas about colonisation. Granted they are/were a small country with a small population so they had troubles populating their massive territories. So one of their crypto-Jews comes up with the brilliant idea of mass race-mixing.
The Portuguese males get like all the brown and black pussy they can handle as long as they keep fucking and breeding workers and soldiers for their Empire.
This is how Brazil, Cape Verde, Goa, Macao and East Timor happened. Even some Portuguese posters here won't ree at miscegenation, they don't see anything wrong with race-mixing, simply because their former colonies are a filthy cesspool of miscegenation lel.
The French tried similar things especially in New France, but I think that was less to do with population and more to do with being French.
Bookmarks