Why did the Germans become the Nazis in WWII instead of the British?

[Corporate_Demolisher]

He did considered blacks a monkey like yes. But many other non-white races he considered noble, asians, amerindians, arabs (if you count them as nonwhite), he considered iranians as aryans (i dont know if they are non-white though)

Meanwhile he didn’t consider “white” races like the Slavs to be true whites and persecuted them along with Jews.

[Crn Volk]

Meanwhile he didn’t consider “white” races like the Slavs to be true whites and persecuted them along with Jews.

He persecuted Poles and Russians, not all Slavs. Croats, Ukrainians, Slovaks, Bulgarians were Axis allies for example and some had their own SS divisions.

[Corporate_Demolisher]

Britishers were historically motivated by money not ideology. They were certainly no less racist than the Germans, but the fundamental difference between them and the Germans is that the Anglos are sellouts, they have no sense of collectivist unity in the way that other Europeans do. They would kill their own if it meant getting rich, race be damned.

[Dick]

Britishers were historically motivated by money not ideology. They were certainly no less racist than the Germans, but the fundamental difference between them and the Germans is that the Anglos are sellouts, they have no sense of collectivist unity in the way that other Europeans do. They would kill their own if it meant getting rich, race be damned.

They're definitely less tribalistic, especially New World/colonial Anglos, than Scots and Irish. French Canadians are very tribal to this day for example as well

[NSXD60]

No surprise, one-sided ideology is again reemerging in the form of news blackouts on most media, banning of opposing views on social media, and punitive El Presidente mandates. Controlling info then was as important to the Nazis as it now is to Biden and his Notsees.

[Chocolate_Hound]

The crimes committed by the British Empire have been vastly overblown compared to similar behaviour by other European powers. The Ottomans and other Islamic Caliphates have tried to invade, mass rape and conquer Europe for hundreds of years, and were infamous for raiding European countries for white European slaves. African nations and Islamic ones were infamous for mass slavery and genocide, such as the Mfecane period which were mass genocides of South African black clans by other black clans. According to recent genetic studies of ancient Africans continent-wide it was determined that the Bantu expansion literally deleted every other native African race, through mass migration and extermination.

The Qing dynasty of Imperial China genocided 900000 Dzungars in the 1800's, the majority of the world’s slaves were actually found in Africa and the Middle East. Ethiopia prior to invasion by fascist Italy had an apartheid system with Amharas as the ruling elite with 3+ million slaves. Mussolini abolished slavery in Ethiopia but it came back after WW2, only to cease again after heavy US pressure. The British Empire is literally the reason slavery is banned worldwide, because they went down the Red Sea and shoved guns into Arab slavers’ mouths.

Most of the planet welcomed Brits with open arms. It's a myth that everyone fights or resents against the dominant power especially one so benevolent as the British Empire.

Despite everything you may have heard and fifty years of propagandising by 'post-colonial' historians (i.e. coping non-whites and their wog allies) colonialism was never profitable. EVER. Colonialism was expensive as fuck and the vast majority of colonies were a net drain on the metropolis' finances. Britain made more money off of China without more than a few hundred square kilometres of territory than it did from the whole of Africa and the Caribbean put together. The British tax payer funded colonial militaries and each colony had its own budget which meant that it never sent a single bean in profit back to Britain.

The Empire left its colonies in a better state than other European powers. Five of the richest 10 countries in Africa and six of the world’s 10 richest countries were once either British colonies or British protectorates.

On the other hand, the Middle East has done jack shit for the world. The west has brought the world to it's current technological boom, which the rest of the world takes for granted.

No one wants you anywhere so you should just blow yourself up in some market in Germany and take some more towelheads with you.



You are mentally retarded. Germans were far more imperialistic than the British.

The German imperialist mentality over continental Europe manifested itself as the Polish–Lithuanian–Teutonic War, German nationalism under Bismarck, WW1, genocidal WW2 Nazism and now through aggressive liberalism enforced through the EU.

Germany along with France has always been the disaster for Europe, right back from destroying the Roman Empire, to cucking to Charlemagne, to be enslaved by Habsburg Popery for centuries (only to be redeemed by Martin Luther's Protestantism), betraying their Nordic neighbours over Russia, bending over backwards for Bismarck, to exporting Communism to Russia, to starting WW1 and therefore WW2 which was merely a continuation of WW1, to the EU of today which is just a way to force poor Eastern European trash to buy expensive German products instead of making their own, thus pushing them to mass immigrate into Western Europe.

Otto von Bismarck played the French like a damned fiddle and caused the Franco-Prussian war creating Germany. But when it came to establishing the government system, Queen Victoria wife of Frederick III, advocated for a more liberal British system whereas conservative Bismarck advocated for a more authoritarian system. Bismarck won due to anti-British sentiment amongst the German nobles of the day. If the British system had been implemented British-German ties would have been stronger, the monarch wouldn't have fallen, Nazism never risen and rampant diversity bullshit wouldn't dominate today's political culture.

Germany, after its unification and before WW1 was very weak and very backwards. It often refused to follow the European trend of colonisation or economic and scientific development. The ethnic conflict between Slavs and Germans in Austria-Hungary made that impossible.

Had Bismarck made the push to occupy Vienna/the German Habsburg lands into the German Empire, the Reich would have truly lasted a thousand years, and the beauty of Germanic Europe preserved forever.

While Britain was having issues with German industry, Britain shifted their foreign policy around Germany but in a seemingly amicable way after a few continental congress' and conferences (notably the 1878 Congress of Berlin). Bismarck's policy of Germany as "The Continent for Germany, The Sea for Britain" was one that Britain seemed to get behind rather quickly as they shifted focus toward Africa and away from Europe in the 1880's and 1890's.

Kaiser Wilhelm II disrupted it by taking a few notes from Alfred von Tirpitz and thus shifting his focus from Continental Europe and to the Sea and his "Place in the Sun". Wilhelm II really ruined everything diplomatically, even if he had decent domestic policies. His aggressive stances on foreign policy meant that Germany was shackled to a corpse in WW1 (Austria-Hungary).

There was actually a time when Bismarck was still pulling the strings when the German Empire could have been allied to Great Britain. Then Wilhelm dismissed Bismarck and sent Germany on the path to destruction by demanding the creation of a massive navy, completely putting it at odds with Britain.

If it hadn't been for Wilhelm's endless meddling with his cabinets and forcing foreign policy to satiate his own ego and ideals, it is likely that the First World War would have been fought by completely different nations, possibly even avoided altogether.

Ottoman Turks were not significantly darker-complected than native Greeks.

[Florstadt]

Sounds like you just made that up there to be honest. Richard 1st organised pogroms against Jews back in the 12 century.

Anyway for the OP, all European nations expanded militarily, why single out Anglos when everyone else was doing the same?

Belgians, French, Portugese, Spanish, Dutch all expanded militarily, they all created empires outside of Europe. German gets a pass on this because it wasn't unified until Bismarck, and was late in the action.

Not defending any atrocities, but singling out the Brits, a tactic used all the time here in the last year of blm, as unique purveyors of it is wrong, they just more success in it due to having the best Navy.

Germany was in a unique position as a European power, having to catch up (hence the land grab in South West Africa in early 1900s).

It is to do with Germany at the end of ww1 and the Versailles Treaty, losing lots of territory, disbanding the armed forces, reperations, having to take sole blame for the war (insanity) despite having an unbroken army in the field. All this plus the economic crash was a perfect cauldron out of which Hitler came forth.

No other European country had to suffer this, certainly not Britain, constitutionally stable since the civil war of the 1600s, and secure as an island with a strong Navy.

The idea that Britain is uniquely responsible so the French, Belgians, Ottomans etc all get a pass in their own adventures is complete and utter b'llsht, a tactic used by the leftists in the UK who despise their own country.

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryU...oms-1189-1190/

[Creoda]

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryU...oms-1189-1190/

1190? Get over it (impossible concept for a Jew I know).

[Anglo-Celtic]

1190? Get over it (impossible concept for a Jew I know).

I agree (the "get over it" part). On the other hand, to be fair, the Irish and the Scottish have been known to hold a grudge or two....hundred.

[Creoda]

I agree (the "get over it" part). On the other hand, to be fair, the Irish and the Scottish have been known to hold a grudge or two....hundred.

I really don't understand people who hold grievances about things from centuries ago. Even up to WWII era, barely anyone alive today was an adult then.