Which war would you change the result?

[Crn Volk]

Battle of Maritsa, 1371 and Battle of Kosovo Polje, 1389

[Kaspias]

And what? Wanting your country to have more territories is very low IQ

It is not related to having more territory but losing a homeland. Imagine Ukrainians lose 83% of Ukraine, half of the population is massacred and the rest were forced to migrate to inner Russia. And let's name this event as X War. Wouldn't you want to change the conclusions of X War? Yeah, that's the case.

[Blondie]

Wouldnt even have needed a lot of change. If Hitler had approved of jet turbines earlier, focused more on submarines instead of the Bismarck and would have put Rommel in command of the fighting forces instead of just wasting him in Africa it would have been a lot different.

Hitler was the reason why Germany has lost the WW2. He knew nothing about strategy it was pretty clear in Eastern Front, his stupid orders were totally against what the experienced commanders said him. Hitler was hardcore slav hater, ukrainians and tons of russians hated on Stalin's regime and they wanted to fight on Wehrmacht's side against the communists but Hitler suggested the senseless brutality against also the simple peoples not only aginst the commies, what contributed a lot to anti german feelings in East. The situation would has been very different with 1-2 million ukrainian and russian soldiers on german side. Also many jew was very talented scientist for example Einstein, the compelte german army and military technology would has been more powerful and Hitler just expelled them out for no reason. Hitler was an idiot, his egoism and megalomania were more important than his own country. He is such harmful like Merkel nowadays.

[Blondie]

I am not advocating or wishing that WWII had a different outcome just putting things into a historical perspective. There's no evidence that Hitler saw us as a target to be exterminated or replaced. That doesn't mean that had they won the war things wouldn't change but we can only speculate.

Nevertheless Hitler was an idiot, Europe would be much better if the Axis wins the WW2. The modern Europe is result of the marxist soviet influence, the ideology (internationalism, radical feminism, anti racism, anti nationalism etc) of modern western radical left or the left in general is based on communism/marxism, it was forced to us by soviets. Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Juncker and other "liberals" are all communist, just like the EU elite in Brussels:



But the early liberals did the biggest sin when they betrayed us in the WW1, what was a winnable war by far. The inner enemy destroyed the Central Powers not the antant army on the front.

[Abriekman]

It is not related to having more territory but losing a homeland. Imagine Ukrainians lose 83% of Ukraine, half of the population is massacred and the rest were forced to migrate to inner Russia. And let's name this event as X War. Wouldn't you want to change the conclusions of X War? Yeah, that's the case.

Balkans were not homeland for Turks, it is homeland for Balkan people. And yes, I wouldn't really change the conclusions of X war, because I do not really care about Ukraine or Ukrainians

[Kaspias]

Balkans were not homeland for Turks, it is homeland for Balkan people. And yes, I wouldn't really change the conclusions of X war, because I do not really care about Ukraine or Ukrainians

And Balkan Turks also a Balkan people, being consisted of majorly by Balkan communities where they live with the addition of newly comer Turks. The fact you know but prefered to ignore.

Ukrainian thing was an example, you may prefer to intervene or not intervene in their affairs. In the same parallel, OP asked the question and itilvolga replied with an answer that has nothing to do with you but you somehow intervened. Better not twisting now.

[Mopi Licinius Crassus]

WWI

nobody really won this war. Germany and Austro-Hungary where never invaded and occupied by the Allied powers

The treaty of Versailles was shameful, and led to WWII

If WWI was called a stalemate, and the harsh penalties imposed on Germany at the treaty of Versailles, had never occurred , WWII would never have happened

[Übermensch]

Cold war, Soviet Union should have been the main geopolitical power in the world.

[Abriekman]

And Balkan Turks also a Balkan people, being consisted of majorly by Balkan communities where they live with the addition of newly comer Turks. The fact you know but prefered to ignore.

Ukrainian thing was an example, you may prefer to intervene or not intervene in their affairs. In the same parallel, OP asked the question and itilvolga replied with an answer that has nothing to do with you but you somehow intervened. Better not twisting now.

In her comment there was nothing about people, it was about territories and as I said person caring about country territories is sick. Would you change the war in favor of the Turks if more people would die???

[Kaspias]

In her comment there was nothing about people, it was about territories and as I said person caring about country territories is sick. Would you change the war in favor of the Turks if more people would die???

In the past? I do not think more people would die, I'd just not make mistakes had done before. Eventually, it was our fault which is behind this devastation for our own people. Now? Territories are not gained by war in the modern world. In this sense, it is stupid to call people for a warcry.

But she did not mean the second one, which is clear according to the context of the question. Balkan Wars were important because of the people living there, not because the sake of the territories.