Is multiculturalism harmful for democracy?

[LittleDarkAge]

And the percentages of the "White" vote in all those elections?

About 60% of Whites voted for Republicans in these elections. As Whites become a minority, the Republicans will never be able to win an election again, which means bye Second Amendment, bye Constitution, bye gun rights, and bye freedom of speech.

[gixajo]

About 60% of Whites voted for Republicans in these elections. As Whites become a minority, the Republicans will never be able to win an election again, which means bye Second Amendment, bye Constitution, bye gun rights, and bye freedom of speech.

Ok.

[LittleDarkAge]

And the percentages of the "White" vote in all those elections?

And if you could divide the vote of these two ethnic groups, because I don't quite understand why they are together

I put those ethnic groups together because both voted the same in percentages, 65%.

[Gredos]

it is harmful to coexistence and the sense of community. It is the greatest crime that can be committed against a society. Those who promote and defend multiculturalism are basically criminals

[alnortedelsur]

About 60% of Whites voted for Republicans in these elections. As Whites become a minority, the Republicans will never be able to win an election again, which means bye Second Amendment, bye Constitution, bye gun rights, and bye freedom of speech.

That's what certain elites want, and they are accomplishing it, unfortunately.

[alnortedelsur]

it is harmful to coexistence and the sense of community. It is the greatest crime that can be committed against a society. Those who promote and defend multiculturalism are basically criminals

Such people should be considered traitors and enemies of the nation (wherever countries they are from).

[Grace O'Malley]

Yes:

Only Anglo-Saxon countries can do democracy. The natural state of human society is despotism. If you tally up all the human lives that have ever been lived on this planet under organized systems of government, no more than five per cent were lived under consensual systems. Even to get up to five per cent, you have to include places like ancient Athens and Tudor England, which wouldn’t pass muster as “democratic” by modern standards. In the last couple of centuries, practically all consensual systems have been Anglo-Saxon. Other cultures can fake it for a few decades, as France, Germany, and Japan are currently doing, but their hearts aren’t really in it and they will swoon gratefully into the arms of a fascist dictator when one comes along

https://worldpopulationreview.com/co...racy-countries

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index

[Wunjoz]

You tell me.

• 90% of Blacks voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012.
• 88% of Blacks voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016.
• 65% of Latinos and Asians voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016.
• 87% of Blacks voted for Joe Biden in 2020.
• 66% of Latinos voted for Joe Biden in 2020.
• 63% of Asians voted for Joe Biden in 2020.

USA would be be South Africa in the long term, if Mormons and Amish didn't exist. I think infertile, individualistic cultures are weak. They have multikulti things too. Only Iran or 3R reversed such degeneracies.

[Dr_Maul]

Nationalism in the 21st century is a meme and illusion, globalism won. What matters is ideology.

Regarding the Islamic viewpoint, it is more based on cooperation rather than complete homogenization. The nations and tribes of the world are supposed to work together ("know each other" in the scripture) but not to "become one" in a sense. We are to view each other (Muslims) as brothers and thus "one" but the best way is for Islamic nations to work together to use their individual strength to cancel out each others weaknesses for the benefit of the Ummah, and not to simply become one.