TA's newest member, a Biblical Catholic - what is it?

[Rethel]

Rather nothing. I don't know fragment from NT in which would be written that
polygamy is a sin. Enlight me if you know such.

Where it is written in the NT that you can have more wives than one?

[Minwell]

Aaa... so you recognize Church Fathers?

I'm trying to recognize the Bible. If Church in his beginnings has constituted it as a main source of christian faith
then its teachings should be compatible with it what is within it and the same others sources of faith including
teachings' doctors of Church must be.

[Minwell]

Where it is written in the NT that you can have more wives than one?

Nowhere as it isn't written that you can have many wives. But the Bible not only contains of NT, but
has also important, big part which is OT. There the God neither did not prohibit polygamy nor punish
for it. So if NT don't tell anything about it, isn't it logical that nothing in this matter has changed?

[Rethel]

I'm trying to recognize the Bible. If Church in his beginnings has constituted it as a main source of christian faith
then its teachings should be compatible with it what is within it and the same others sources of faith including
teachings' doctors of Church must be.

So actually, you do not recognize anything what RCCh teaches. So how can you call yourself a catholic? I don;t get it.

If it is so, and you condemn the pope, then do you belive that CCh is Babylon the Great?

[Rethel]

So if NT don't tell anything about it, isn't it logical that nothing in this matter has changed?

It is not proof, as NT says nothing about many things.

[Rethel]

Lord Jesus is not the God and is dependent on his Father.

Something more?
Getting to know something from you is like pulling teeth...

[Minwell]

So actually, you do not recognize anything what RCCh teaches. So how can you call yourself a catholic? I don;t get it.

How anything? Still catholic Church teaches in some way christian truths, although part of them were corrupted.
As I found out that I don't leave the Church, so why I cannot call myself catholic, especially biblical catholic?

If it is so, and you condemn the pope, then do you belive that CCh is Babylon the Great?

Eeee, nie. It would be silly if I was member of something what is Babylon the Great, as if the angel commands
in the Apocalypse to leave this place. Certainly nor catholic Church nor Rome are this entity as there Lord Jesus
wasn't crusified.

[Minwell]

So actually, you do not recognize anything what RCCh teaches. So how can you call yourself a catholic? I don;t get it.

If it is so, and you condemn the pope, then do you belive that CCh is Babylon the Great?

It is not proof, as NT says nothing about many things.

Rigth, but still should be found legit basis which gives right to think that this matter has changed according to ST. In the NT I cannot find anything in that
case. But if we agree that Church and his officials have right to establish christian rules then it is possible to prohibit poligamy in any way. Cathlic Church
did that and I respect that, but that does not mean that polygamy is bad in its nature, because if it was so that would mean that God Yahweh allowed some
people to commit sin. Similiarly is with priests and marriage. Catholic Church prohbit priests to have wives, but that not mean it is something evil, as in the
Bible priests have wives and f.e. Orthodox Church allows his priests to do it.

[Rethel]

How anything? Still catholic Church teaches in some way christian truths,

Some...

although part of them were corrupted.

How big part accordig to you?

As I found out that I don't leave the Church, so why I cannot call myself catholic, especially biblical catholic?

Taking unto account, that you believe differently...

Eeee, nie. It would be silly if I was member of something what is Babylon the Great, as if the angel commands
in the Apocalypse to leave this place.

Do you live in Vatican?

Certainly nor catholic Church nor Rome

Isn;t Rome on the seven hills?

are this entity as there Lord Jesus wasn't crusified.

Did you hear about symbolism?

[Rethel]

Rigth, but still should be found legit basis which gives right to think that this matter has changed according to ST. In the NT I cannot find anything in that
case.

So do you belive that Old Covenant still applies?

But if we agree that Church and his officials have right to establish christian rules then it is possible to prohibit poligamy in any way.

So no afterall?

Cathlic Church did that and I respect that,

But other you don't...

but that does not mean that polygamy is bad in its nature,

What if wives hate each other?

because if it was so that would mean that God Yahweh allowed some
people to commit sin.

Can't commandments change?

Similiarly is with priests and marriage. Catholic Church prohbit priests to have wives, but that not mean it is something evil, as in the
Bible priests have wives and f.e. Orthodox Church allows his priests to do it.

But Bible didn;t. So, you are not consequent. One thing you agree to change, other don't... it is really hard to understand your way of thinking...