1
any luck with those anceint Polish BAMs I posted in the other thread?Even some of Krakauer Berg samples are "Lithuanian-like" in Global25. But when I use K36 they are not similar to Lithuanians.
With K36 averages only KRA007 is Lithuanian-shifted:
Sample - closest populations (top three):
KRA001 - 1. Poles, 2. Ukrainians, 3. Belarusians
KRA002 - 1. Lusatian Sorbs, 2. Poles, 3. Czesi
KRA003 - 1. Poles, 2. Lusatian Sorbs, 3. Czesi
KRA004 - 1. Poles, 2. Belarusians, 3. Ukrainians
KRA005 - 1. Ukrainians, 2. Poles, 3. Belarusians
KRA006 - 1. Lusatian Sorbs, 2. Poles, 3. Ukrainians
KRA007 - 1. Poles, 2. Belarusians, 3. Lithuanians
KRA008 - 1. Poles, 2. Ukrainians, 3. Belarusians
KRA009 - 1. Lusatian Sorbs, 2. Poles, 3. Ukrainians
KRA010 - 1. Poles, 2. Ukrainians, 3. Belarusians
KRA011 - 1. Poles, 2. Belarusians, 3. Ukrainians
=====
BTW, there are also some Slavs in this study (samples from Late Medieval Lübeck):
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....act_id=3762113
So far I checked two:
Lübeck_HGH1600:
[1] "1. CLOSEST SINGLE ITEM DISTANCE%"
IS_Iceland
0.9041875
NL_Overijssel
0.9436731
DK_Northern-Jutland
0.9439364
DK_Faroe-Islands
0.9491206
GB_Shetland
0.9769964
DE_Westfalen
0.9770727
DK_Zealand
0.9776641
NO_Vestlandet
0.9782811
(...)
Lübeck_HGH1579:
[1] "1. CLOSEST SINGLE ITEM DISTANCE%"
DE_Nordfriesland
1.094312
NL_Drenthe
1.166477
NL_Noord-Holland
1.224142
DE_Schleswig
1.226541
DE_Niedersachsen
1.242422
NL_Gelderland
1.257951
(...)
Bookmarks