3
R1a1a1
Other R1a
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,106 Given: 3,279 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,331 Given: 3,924 |
Mine is also R1a1a1b1a2b3.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,626 Given: 21,630 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,626 Given: 21,630 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,626 Given: 21,630 |
Obviously no and less in my paternal line.
Nor do I think you or I know anyone who knows with complete certainty all their ancestors until the eleventh century in his paternal line who are not from any royal family or noblemen of fairly high rank.
And even these ones cannot assure that in those 30-40 generations, there has been no interruption of that line due to illegitimate children, adoptions of children from other marriages who are given the last name of his new father, or adoptions not documented as such.
I have a lot of hope that BIG Y can clarify something more for me on this matter.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
So, the fact, that quite recenty you have no valencian or balearian known ancestors means nothing if we talk about XIth century.
I wanted only to signal a possibility, that you can be a descendant of some slavic guy, similarly as this emir, or maybe even him
In some regions it is possible, but rarely.Nor do I think you or I know anyone who knows with complete certainty all their ancestors until the eleventh century in his paternal line who are not from any royal family or noblemen of fairly high rank.
And this is why hg testing is usefull – allows to check if legal situation is really legit.And even these ones cannot assure that in those 30-40 generations, there has been no interruption of that line due to illegitimate children, adoptions of children from other marriages who are given the last name of his new father, or adoptions not documented as such.
Maybe, maybe, very maybe.I have a lot of hope that BIG Y can clarify something more for me on this matter.
First genealogy and bibliography, then hg (not BIG at the beginning,
Y37 is enough) then confirmation of hg, and the BIG at the very end.
If you are starting from the end, it will give you almost nothing – not
too much more, than this what you allready know.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,626 Given: 21,630 |
I´ve told "maybe", because I cannot know it, and in any case, genealogic research with just 100-200 years back is more accurate, easier to know and more reliable than the one that goes back 1000 years ago, an this is an idea easily understood by anyone.
That´s what I´ve said than it is more difficult in my paternal side, because in the area where my paternal side comes from, has been several massive destruction of parish and municipal historical records in various wars, especially two very massive ones, one by the French in the Napoleonic invasion and the other in the civil war by the republican side.
Yeah, agree, in my particular case, I trust FTDNA and its BIG Y more than genealogy.
The ideal would be to be able to support genealogy with genetics, and within genetics, be based especially on Ydna (in this particular case) and secondarily on autosomal results.
Maybe always, and in these issues of genetics and genealogy, more maybe than in other issues. Because we cannot be certain in most cases.
In each particular case, I would apply the priorities necessary for that particular case, I would not make general rules regarding priorities.
For each specific problem, use specific tools, used in a specific way.
Edit:Ortography.
Last edited by gixajo; 04-15-2021 at 02:33 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2 Given: 0 |
Hi, I used the Marley y dna predictor, it was written R1a1a1 and r1a-m417.
My father is sicilian, wtf? Hahahahahah
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,587 Given: 8,908 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks