Richard Dawkins - Transgenders are fakers

[Hulu]

I think he is right If Dolezal can't change her race why can they change ther gender. That's appropriating..

British scientist Richard Dawkins is stripped of his Humanist Of The Year award after comparing transgender people to race faker Rachel Dolezal

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...o=taboola_feed

• Richard Dawkins, 80, has been stripped of his 'Humanist of the Year' title
• American Humanist Association revoked its honour from evolutionary biologist
• Comes after he compared transgender people to to Rachel Dolezal on Twitter
• Mr Dawkins said honour 'hadn’t meant enough to be worth recording in his CV'

[Teutone]

Even a Broken Clock Is Right Twice a Day

[CommonSense]

A sensible notion by Dawkins. Many share that sentiment, but are reluctant to speak out in public in the west. This is what happens once you do. SJWs are terrorizing humanity.

[Defiance]

Figures. If you want to tell the truth, be ready to run.

[Anglo-Celtic]

He's clearly a bigot who suffers from transphobia, which is a main part of the White male Christian conservative heteronormative gender-shaming patriarchy that targets gender fluid proud people of color. He should be banned from all aspects of society because he has problematic and unfortunate heterodox beliefs that are quite troubling and violent. He probably shames trans-species animals too. For instance, cheetahs, who identify as humans, should be able to compete against Usain Bolt if they choose to do so.

[sean]

Dawkins is a dead horse attention-whoring to stay relevant.

Spoiler!

It's interesting that he's a leftover of the mid-late 2000's fedoracore atheist movement. Back in the 2000-2008 era, atheists were taken VERY seriously, and given grand stages for debating against members of Parliament, and Bishops and whatnot. They had people like Hitchens, and Sam Harris, and Dawkins on their side.

But in the Obama years, they gradually became more and more irrelevant. Their conferences got hijacked by the social justice movement and feminist movement. They lost their best intellectuals. The whole atheism thing passed because they decided to invest their money in other crap, like transgender story hour and ANTIFA.

Now no one cares about Dawkins anymore, Hitchens died, no one ever cared about Dennett, but Sam Harris sort of managed to stay relevant. Most zoomers probably don’t even know who he is.

[JamesBond007]

Dawkins is a dead horse attention-whoring to stay relevant.

Spoiler!

It's interesting that he's a leftover of the mid-late 2000's fedoracore atheist movement. Back in the 2000-2008 era, atheists were taken VERY seriously, and given grand stages for debating against members of Parliament, and Bishops and whatnot. They had people like Hitchens, and Sam Harris, and Dawkins on their side.

But in the Obama years, they gradually became more and more irrelevant. Their conferences got hijacked by the social justice movement and feminist movement. They lost their best intellectuals. The whole atheism thing passed because they decided to invest their money in other crap, like transgender story hour and ANTIFA.

Now no one cares about Dawkins anymore, Hitchens died, no one ever cared about Dennett, but Sam Harris sort of managed to stay relevant. Most zoomers probably don’t even know who he is.

Dawkins picking on religion is low hanging fruit. Psychiatry had taken over the role that religion played, during feudalism, in neoliberal capitalist society and is obviously pseudo-science to a scientist of his stature but he does not criticize it like Thomas Szasz and some Marxist scholars.