1
Maybe, but I'd like to add a few things :
1)
Not everything is about homicide rate and gdp/capita, those are only two metrics. GDP/capita doesn't not necessarily mean much if a small % of people is holding large % of wealth.
2)
Being a honest, working class person today is probably harder than it was in 60s/70s/80s than, gdp/capita and homicide rates aside.
Nowadays in US you have some extremely wealthy people and a huge amount of working people who are either indebted or live paycheck to paycheck. Homicides were always largely black on black.
Maybe nowadays it's better to belong to the top 5% than in 1980, but who really cares? The rest don't have it easier.
3)
USA homicide and crime rate started to rise in second half of 20th century after civil rights and desegregation. In 00s it bounced back to pre-desegregation levels of 1950s. Not to mention at the beginning of the 20th century, USA had 1-2 / 100.000 / year homicide rate, same as western Europe. So USA homicide rate is still really high compared to 120 years ago.
4)
Hispanics immigrants and their descendants in USA have much lower avarage per capita income than do Whites (and lower than black-americans even). So I think it can be argued that hispanic immigration has a negative fiscal impact on USA.
Bookmarks