Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Would prehistoric humans have been considered negroid or australoid by modern standards?

  1. #1
    Junior Member Millennium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:02 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Country
    Singapore
    Gender
    Posts
    86
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 13/0
    Given: 1/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default Would prehistoric humans have been considered negroid or australoid by modern standards?

    Based on skulls & reconstructions? What modern races do you think prehistoric humans would have resembled most physically? For me, I think it’s australoids, because they have the most physically archaic features of modern humans, but others may have other opinions.


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    06-05-2021 @ 05:39 PM
    Location
    Boolgaria
    Ethnicity
    Boolgar
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    I2a1a2b (I-L621)
    mtDNA
    H3
    Taxonomy
    Paleo Atlantid (actually Dinarid + Westbaltid parents)
    Hero
    Database error
    Age
    25
    Gender
    Posts
    14,091
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 17,928/1,310
    Given: 1,819/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Prehistoric Europeans would have looks like just like modern day Cromagnid phenotypes, just a lot darker pigmented.

    Visualize Brad Pitt with brown skin and black hair.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    06-09-2021 @ 04:45 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Central European, Eastern European, Finno-Ugric.
    Ethnicity
    Hungarian
    Ancestry
    ...
    Country
    Hungary
    Y-DNA
    I2
    Politics
    ,,,
    Hero
    ,,,,
    Religion
    ,,,
    Gender
    Posts
    6,986
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 7,262/107
    Given: 8,834/303

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    It depends on what you mean by 'prehistoric'. If pre-out of africa migration humans existed today, they'd be classified as 'subsaharan african', but prehistoric means 'before written records' (3-4000 BCE) so Cro-Magnons, WHGs, Anatolian farmers etc are also prehistoric. Not to mention ancestors of East Asians, Native Americans, South Asians etc etc... so prehistoric people were diverse, unless by prehistoric you meant pre-out of africa migration (50-100,000 BCE). Then there were other 'humanoid' (non-Sapiens) lineages like Denisovans, Neanderthals, Erectus etc that died out.
    ....

  4. #4
    Junior Member Millennium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:02 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Country
    Singapore
    Gender
    Posts
    86
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 13/0
    Given: 1/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    By sub Saharan do you mean negroid? Yes I meant pre-out of Africa migration.

  5. #5
    Junior Member Millennium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:02 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Country
    Singapore
    Gender
    Posts
    86
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 13/0
    Given: 1/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    https://analyseeconomique.wordpress....rle-section-2/

    Check out the tables in this link

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-11-2020, 04:33 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-03-2019, 08:53 PM
  3. Prehistoric humans loved their dogs to death
    By PHDNM in forum Archaeology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-2019, 03:51 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-20-2018, 05:06 PM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-05-2013, 12:17 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •