Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Would prehistoric humans have been considered negroid or australoid by modern standards?

  1. #1
    Junior Member Millennium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:43 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Country
    Singapore
    Gender
    Posts
    86
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 13/0
    Given: 1/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default Would prehistoric humans have been considered negroid or australoid by modern standards?

    Based on skulls & reconstructions? What modern races do you think prehistoric humans would have resembled most physically? For me, I think its australoids, because they have the most physically archaic features of modern humans, but others may have other opinions.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Last Online
    06-14-2021 @ 11:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic
    Ethnicity
    Celtic
    Ancestry
    47.0 Anatolia_Barcin_N 40.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 12.4 WHG
    Country
    France
    mtDNA
    H1
    Politics
    Liberal
    Gender
    Posts
    448
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 182/56
    Given: 73/25

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
    Based on skulls & reconstructions? What modern races do you think prehistoric humans would have resembled most physically? For me, I think it’s australoids, because they have the most physically archaic features of modern humans, but others may have other opinions.
    Obviously. And the people closest to the Africans who left Africa giving rise to the Eurasians and Asians are the /Jarawa/sentinels.


  3. #3
    Senior Member Hoihey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:31 PM
    Ethnicity
    White
    Ancestry
    Tosk Highlander
    Country
    United States
    Politics
    Apathetic
    Religion
    Apathetic
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Age
    20
    Gender
    Posts
    959
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 486/17
    Given: 0/0

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Ancient humans would have looked like SUBHUMAN BEASTS to modern folks! This was a time when genetic differences were enormous! Everyone in your clan looked like you, inbreeding was a huge concern, isolation was the norm, not the exception. You were far less similar to the tribe 1000 miles away from you as a modern Irishman is to a Chinaman. Tribes were tiny, a few dozen at most who stuck to their own, nations and collective societies were pure insanity at the time. Absolutely no sense of cooperation or unity or diversity if someone was from outside your clan you killed them lest they kill you. This and a tiny population allowed for diversity that makes arguing about modern ethnicities laughable: like arguing how fanatically different a German and a Dane look to modern folks. Countless ethnicities were born, 99% went extinct, the 1% that survived eventually cooperated and formed farming and pastoral settlements, eventually mixing to form modern ethnic groups.



















  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:04 PM
    Ethnicity
    Mediterranean Islander
    Country
    Tunisia
    Gender
    Posts
    356
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 139/5
    Given: 102/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by L.o.l.i.t.a View Post
    Obviously. And the people closest to the Africans who left Africa giving rise to the Eurasians and Asians are the /Jarawa/sentinels.


    Yeah but they didn’t look like that, the Jarawa and Onge have developed their own phenotype from adaptations after thousands of years of living on those small islands and being separated from everyone else for so long. The basal eurasians from which everyone comes from would have had a unique cro-magnoid phenotype that doesn’t really closely resemble any of the phenotypes of today. But the older phenotypes such as australoid would have certain similarities with them.

    What we know as the modern sub Saharan negroid race is not as old as basal Eurasian, not even close. So we don’t really know for sure what these people coming out of Africa looked like. They were of course dark skinned but what did they look like metrically? We need skeletal remains

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    JamesBond007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:21 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    British
    Ancestry
    Brittonic, Swaefas, Saxon, Viking, Gaullish
    Country
    England
    Region
    Devon
    Y-DNA
    R1b-Z253 (native Britonnic)
    mtDNA
    H1
    Politics
    Vandalism in Rome -BNP
    Hero
    Nick Griffin
    Religion
    Anglican
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Age
    43
    Gender
    Posts
    6,725
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 4,559/163
    Given: 1,021/3

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by L.o.l.i.t.a View Post
    Obviously. And the people closest to the Africans who left Africa giving rise to the Eurasians and Asians are the /Jarawa/sentinels.

    It has been claimed — from the early 1900s-onward — that the first humans came from Africa (i.e., the “out of Africa” theory), from Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania [1]. So, the theory goes, all humans are ultimately Africans.

    But is that true? We must doubt it. For one thing, ever since the Jew, Franz Boas and his many followers came to dominate anthropology, it has been political. Boas (he became popular beginning in circa 1900; by 1911 his bullshit theories were well-known and popular) was pushing his “Cultural Anthropology” crap as early as 1902. He was then vice-president of an organization he himself co-founded: the American Anthropological Association (AAA). Today, “Boasian anthropology” is a thing, and a powerful thing . Trivia: roughly half of the anthropologists in America today believe that “race is a social construct” even though they can examine human bones and see otherwise, e.g., they can see that the skulls of Blacks are very different from the skulls of Whites! It’s sad and disturbing.

    Since anthropology is historically so political and so Jewish, you can’t believe the “out of Africa” claim. Just forget it.

    And furthermore, as someone noted recently, negroes can be considered a different species than Whites: they have enough physical differences apart from Whites to make it so. Blacks could instead be called “advanced or sophisticated apes” who resemble humans but aren’t. Read about it below [2].

    Anytime you have an activist Jew like Boas as a central figure in a scientific discipline, you’ve got trouble. But unfortunately for anthropology, it had several Jews as leading figures in the field: Boas, Claude Levi-Strauss, Ashley Montagu, Melville Herskovitz, Gene Weltfish. (Montagu wrote the bogus UNESCO statements on race in 1950 and 1951. UNESCO, a branch of the UN, was co-founded by a Jew named Rene Cassin).

    Bottom line: the field of anthropology is so political and so Jewed that it must begin again. From scratch.

    .

    [1] “Homo habilis, probably the first early human species, occupied Olduvai Gorge approximately 1.9 million years ago” — Wikipedia, May 2021. Boas was also the founder of race denial: “Boas believed that the sweep of cultures, to be found in connection with any sub-species, is so vast and pervasive that there cannot be a relationship between culture and race.” — Wikipedia, May 2021. So, Western culture is not White, according to Boas. Even though it is White and has been since ancient Greece!


    [2] “Blacks are unique in that when we arrived, they had no written language, no wheel, no architectural works, nothing at all that would indicate they live a human existence. Whereas literature and palaces and cities existed in almost every corner of the earth, from the Incas to the Indians to the Persians to the Chinese to Stonehenge to Ankar Wat in Cambodia — nothing existed in Africa.”

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03...s-arent-human/

    — article “Blacks Aren’t Human


    "Recently, two physical anthropologists reanalyzed Boas’s head-form data. They report that Boas — now considered the founding father of modern American anthropology — was wrong.“

    “Penn State historian of science Robert Proctor says, ‘Boasians turned away from bones altogether.’ Or, as Skull Wars author Thomas states in an October 8, 2002, New York Times article reporting on the Sparks-Jantz paper: ‘Once we anthropologists said race doesn’t exist, we have ignored it since then.'”

    What is a Jew? A human lying machine. Lie, lie, lie, in order to aid the paranoid Jews as a people. Old saying: “each time something big happens in the world, the Jew asks himself only one question: ‘is this good or bad for the Jews?'” Nothing else matters. They are navel-gazing, self-centered people.

    https://news.psu.edu/story/140739/20...bones-and-race
    sample: England
    distance: 2.908763

    sample: Dutch
    distance: 3.13281

    sample: Scotland
    distance: 4.0097629999999995

  6. #6
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    06-09-2021 @ 04:45 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Central European, Eastern European, Finno-Ugric.
    Ethnicity
    Hungarian
    Ancestry
    ...
    Country
    Hungary
    Y-DNA
    I2
    Politics
    ,,,
    Hero
    ,,,,
    Religion
    ,,,
    Gender
    Posts
    6,986
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 7,261/107
    Given: 8,834/303

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    It depends on what you mean by 'prehistoric'. If pre-out of africa migration humans existed today, they'd be classified as 'subsaharan african', but prehistoric means 'before written records' (3-4000 BCE) so Cro-Magnons, WHGs, Anatolian farmers etc are also prehistoric. Not to mention ancestors of East Asians, Native Americans, South Asians etc etc... so prehistoric people were diverse, unless by prehistoric you meant pre-out of africa migration (50-100,000 BCE). Then there were other 'humanoid' (non-Sapiens) lineages like Denisovans, Neanderthals, Erectus etc that died out.
    ....

  7. #7
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    06-09-2021 @ 04:45 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Central European, Eastern European, Finno-Ugric.
    Ethnicity
    Hungarian
    Ancestry
    ...
    Country
    Hungary
    Y-DNA
    I2
    Politics
    ,,,
    Hero
    ,,,,
    Religion
    ,,,
    Gender
    Posts
    6,986
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 7,261/107
    Given: 8,834/303

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MechtoidAfalouHG View Post
    Yeah but they didn’t look like that, the Jarawa and Onge have developed their own phenotype from adaptations after thousands of years of living on those small islands and being separated from everyone else for so long. The basal eurasians from which everyone comes from would have had a unique cro-magnoid phenotype that doesn’t really closely resemble any of the phenotypes of today. But the older phenotypes such as australoid would have certain similarities with them.

    What we know as the modern sub Saharan negroid race is not as old as basal Eurasian, not even close. So we don’t really know for sure what these people coming out of Africa looked like. They were of course dark skinned but what did they look like metrically? We need skeletal remains
    Khoisan split from the rest 150,000 years ago and they're still classified as Subsaharan/Black, or not? SSAs are diverse. I think pre-out of Africa migration humans would fit in that diversity. If they evolved around the equator they should've been black skinned too.
    ....

  8. #8
    Junior Member Millennium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:43 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Country
    Singapore
    Gender
    Posts
    86
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 13/0
    Given: 1/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Australian aborigines have the most phenotypically archaic appearance & skull & skeletal traits of modern humans, so I must assume that they come closest of modern humans to what prehistoric humans would have looked like before & not long after migrating out of Africa. Africans & Andaman Islanders appear to be very neotenized.

  9. #9
    Junior Member Millennium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:43 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Ethnicity
    Mixed
    Country
    Singapore
    Gender
    Posts
    86
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 13/0
    Given: 1/0

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    https://analyseeconomique.wordpress....rle-section-2/



    Check out the tables in this link

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Richmondbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:12 AM
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic, Germanic, Anglo, Baltic
    Ethnicity
    English, French, Irish, Scottish, German, Distant American Indian
    Ancestry
    Mother's Side: Colonial Virginia. Fathers Side: German/Lithuania early 1900s.
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Virginia
    Y-DNA
    R-M417
    mtDNA
    H
    Taxonomy
    Alpine-Atlantid-CM
    Politics
    Paleo Conservative
    Hero
    General Lee
    Religion
    Christian Protestant
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Age
    42
    Gender
    Posts
    10,273
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 6,588/1,634
    Given: 7,324/1,157

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    No. We were always fully human and we came from the middle east, not Africa

    Sent from my G9 PRO using Tapatalk

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-17-2021, 10:41 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-11-2020, 04:33 PM
  3. Prehistoric humans loved their dogs to death
    By PHDNM in forum Archaeology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-2019, 03:51 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-20-2018, 05:06 PM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-05-2013, 12:17 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •