1942: "The Never Again Club" & Sterilization of all German males

[European blood]

THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN OBSERVER, MARCH 6, 1942

NEVER AGAIN
A DISCUSSION ON GERMANY

IVOR DUNCAN

IN LONDON AN ASSOCIATION has been founded which has adopted a motto the suficiently clearly expresses its mission. In the present was: Never again! And although this slogan is common to all the Allies, great and small, although it unifies and expresses to a remarkable extent the thoughts and wishes for the future of Polish exile as well as the American Congressman, nevertheless the London Never Again Club may meet much criticism and many attacks.

For if to-day two people are talking about Germany and come to agreement on the fact that Germany must never again be allowed to embark on a new, bloodthirsty expedition in pursuit of the phantom of world dominion, this does not mean that their thoughts are identical. The words "never again" have a very different content and varying sound according to whether they are uttered by a Czech refugee whose face and back still bear the scars left by a Gestapo beating, or by an American who sees in descriptions of the horrors of the concentration camp only Gruelpropaganda of emigrants, which should not be believed.

Innocent Lambs Transformed into Wolves

All are in agreement as to the fact that the problem of Germany must be solved if the present horrors are in fact never again to be repeated. The profound difference, however, lies in the conceptions as to how and by what methods this problem is to be solved. The Never Again Club that we have mentioned above wished to spread propaganda for a solution of the German problem and a view of Germany which should follow the ideas of Lord Vansittart. ("The German nation needs the most drastic cure in history and ... if it is not applied the world will die of the German disease" ... "We are at war with the German nation because our real enemy is German militarism. And Militarism has a long and well-established hold over the German people, including the workers." This, however, is only one of the many variations in the abundant scale of opinions about Germany and the future post-war attitude to Germany. There are opinions even more drastic than those of Vansittart, which speak of the Germans only as Huns, who must be in part systematically slaughtered and in part systematically sterilised (I have seen an entirely serious letter sent by "sent by a group of Englishmen to the Allied Premiers recommending in nine points the sterilisation of all male Germans: Point 1, for instance, for instance, stated: "It is in line with German pre-war home policy and legislation"; point 4 declared: "It is quick business—only ten minutes per case," and finally point 7 stated: "It is inexpensive. We have with medical advice worked out a scheme, comprising operators and anesthetic for 40,000,000 German males—it means approximately £5,000,000.")

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.b...zation-of.html




Germany Must Perish!

http://www.ihr.org/books/kaufman/perish.html

[YOUTUBE]EAyXpW-ygJY[/YOUTUBE]

[Albion]

There were a lot of incredibly bad ideas on what to do with Germany after WWII, this is quite extreme.

[Methusalem]

Fucking retarded.

[microrobert]

"Should We Kill the Germans—or Save Them?"

In the January 4 and 5 editions of the New York newspaper PM there appeared a feature titled 'What Are We Going to Do With the Germans?' which consisted of several short articles by personalities whose opinions were presumably considered of merit. The most controversial piece was written by Professor Albert Hooton (who's featured before on this blog), which I've transcribed here in full, after I found these editions of PM on the newspaper archival website fultonhistory.com.

By Earnest Hooton:

Breed War Strain Out of Germans

Professor Earnest Albert Hooton, Professor of Anthropology at Harvard University is particularly interested in man's biological development. He is the author of Apes, Men, and Morons, published in 1937. His approach to anthropological and social problems is always unorthodox and he likes nothing better then to throw out startling ideas for the sake of discussion they may develop. His contribution to What Are We Going to Do With the Germans? is pitched in that key.

(The following suggestions are offered by a physicial anthropologist who has spent many years in the study of race, nationality, and the relation of individual biology to behavior. However, these suggestions represent no consensus of anthropological opinion; they have not been submitted to any group and have been endorsed by no one. The author, himself, is not fully confident of the practicability of the measures outlined. He merely presents them for discussion.

E. A. H.)

Basic Postulates

(1) The Behavior of a nation arises from the mass of its population and not from leaders or restricted social classes. National culture, national psychology, national ideals are at once the products of the aggregate of biological units of the population and the influence which tend to select for survival and to exaggerate those biological types of men which most readily conform to national behavioral pattens. Both cultural environment and heredity interact to produce in nations stable and persistent modes of behavior.

(2) Substantial amelioration of national behavior cannot be effected solely by external efforts to change the national culture (form of government, ideologies, religion, education, economies). Biological measures for the bettering of the physical mental, and moral quality of individual human units must also be applied to insure permanent improvement.

(3) To break the vicious cycle of inter-action between a militaristic state and the predatory tendencies of its citizens, the former must be destroyed and the latter neutralized or bred out. Since the state is the mechanism for the operation of group aggressions, its destruction most effectually frustrates such aggressions and at the same time makes it easier to deal with the cultural and biological quality of the population by individuals.

APPLICATION TO POST-WAR GERMANY

General Objective

To destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.

(1) Execute or imprison for life all leaders of the Nazi party; permanently exile all professional army officers.

(2) For a period of 20 years or more utilize the bulk of the present German army as rehabilitation labor units in devastated areas of the Allied Nations in Europe and elsewhere. These laborers should not be treated as prisoners of war or convicts but as paid employees (supervised and restricted as to movement from the area of their work). They might be allowed the privilege of naturalization upon evidence of good behavior. The single men should be permitted to marry only women of the country of their abode or naturalization.

The families of the men already married should remain in Germany for a period of years, but might eventually be permitted to join the fathers. The latter should not be allowed to return to Germany. The objects of this measure include reduction of the birth rate of "pure" Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding, and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.

(3) Break up the German Reich into several states (probably its original component states), permitting each, after a suitable interval of supervision and government by the Allied Nations, to choose its own form of non-Fascist government. The object of this measure is to destroy the national framework of unified German aggression.

(4) During the period of supervision and occupation of the several states by armies and civilian staffs of the Allied Nations, encourage members of these groups to intermarry with the German women and to settle there permanently. During this period encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.

PM, Monday, January 4, 1943 (Vol. III, No. 172), pp.1-3. (enlarged versions here and here)

[Peterski]

[Peterski]

[1R0N M4N XL]

this was taught in history books.