1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 685 Given: 443 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 685 Given: 443 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 685 Given: 443 |
A mí me da igual si es indio, blanco, mongólico o africano, es la tremenda gilipollez que dijo y tan ufano, tan tranquilo... estúpido no acabaría de definirle...
Tiene que ser parte de la mala influencia y las fatídicas vibraciones de Sanchinflas sobre sujeto susceptible....
Hechos son amores, y lo demás, buenas razones.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 685 Given: 443 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 685 Given: 443 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,083 Given: 3,017 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,915 Given: 27,872 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,083 Given: 3,017 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,180 Given: 8,859 |
Mas bien ignorante. Este tio no conoce ni su propio pais.
Que alguien le muestre los estudios geneticos de su pais para que se baje de la nube.
Genetic admixture patterns in Argentinian Patagonia
Published: June 17, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214830
Abstract
As in other Latin American populations, Argentinians are the result of the admixture amongst different continental groups, mainly from America and Europe, and to a lesser extent from Sub-Saharan Africa. However, it is known that the admixture processes did not occur homogeneously throughout the country. Therefore, considering the importance for anthropological, medical and forensic researches, this study aimed to investigate the population genetic structure of the Argentinian Patagonia, through the analysis of 46 ancestry informative markers, in 433 individuals from five different localities. Overall, in the Patagonian sample, the average individual ancestry was estimated as 35.8% Native American (95% CI: 32.2–39.4%), 62.1% European (58.5–65.7%) and 2.1% African (1.7–2.4%). Comparing the five localities studied, statistically significant differences were observed for the Native American and European contributions, but not for the African ancestry. The admixture results combined with the genealogical information revealed intra-regional variations that are consistent with the different geographic origin of the participants and their ancestors. As expected, a high European ancestry was observed for donors with four grandparents born in Europe (96.8%) or in the Central region of Argentina (85%). In contrast, the Native American ancestry increased when the four grandparents were born in the North (71%) or in the South (61.9%) regions of the country, or even in Chile (60.5%). In summary, our results showed that differences on continental ancestry contribution have different origins in each region in Patagonia, and even in each locality, highlighting the importance of knowing the origin of the participants and their ancestors for the correct interpretation and contextualization of the genetic information.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ar...l.pone.0214830
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks