Motala HG female reconstruction

[Rethel]

You can see she is European, looks Faelid tbh but more like a rugged prototype of that.

extremly robust for a woman.

OP woman is an archaic version of Scandinavian CM: much more robust.

Because she was like a double reversed quadroon, i.e. white euronegro.
The light pigmentation comes from the indoeuropean quarter of her au.
The rest is Cromagnionian.

[Ygsi]

Yet I am forced by the PC people to believe that people in Scandinavia looked like the woman in the picture below as late as 5000 years ago, otherwise I be waycist and shiet.



On a more serious note though, the only thing I doubt about the op picture woman was that she was blonde. I doubt there were light haired people during the Mesolithic anywhere, let alone Scandinavia, since blondism originated in Eastern Europe at the beginning of the Neolithic period. But other than that I pretty much think that people in Sweden looked like her during the Mesolithic.

[Ygsi]

Yet I am forced by the PC people to believe that people in Scandinavia looked like the woman in the picture below as late as 5000 years ago, otherwise I be waycist and shiet.



On a more serious note though, the only thing I doubt about the op picture woman was that she was blonde. I doubt there were light haired people during the Mesolithic anywhere, let alone Scandinavia, since blondism originated in Eastern Europe at the beginning of the Neolithic period. But other than that I pretty much think that people in Sweden looked like her during the Mesolithic.

[Rethel]

Yet I am forced by the PC people

What is it?

to believe that people in Scandinavia looked like the woman in the picture below as late as 5000 years ago

Becasue they did and there is nothing starage in that. She looks even quite well.

You explained it to yourself btw:

I doubt there were light haired people during the Mesolithic anywhere, let alone Scandinavia, since blondism originated in Eastern Europe

[Ygsi]

What is it?



Becasue they did and there is nothing starage in that. She looks even quite well.

You explained it to yourself btw:

My point is that the natives of Scandinavia looked like the woman posted in the op picture even during the Mesolithic, minus blonde hair. But other than that, Mesolithic Scandinavians definitely had fair skin, blue eyes, etc.

On the other hand, are you telling me that the Scandinavians of say 5000-6000 years ago looked closer to let's say Ethiopid than Europid?

[Rethel]

My point is that the natives of Scandinavia looked like the woman posted in the op picture even during the Mesolithic, minus blonde hair. But other than that, Mesolithic Scandinavians definitely had fair skin, blue eyes, etc.

Nope. Whitness came with Indoeuropeans, whereever you look, it is there. Motala was 81% WHG, what equals to some 70-75% of CM. Rest is an indoeuropean admix, whch in western and northern Scandinavia picked up to 49% and in easten to 38%.

looked closer to let's say Ethiopid than Europid?

Yep.

[Ygsi]

Nope. Whitness came with Indoeuropeans, whereever you look, it is there. Motala was 81% WHG, what equals to some 70-75% of CM. Rest is an indoeuropean admix, whch in western and northern Scandinavia picked up to 50% and in easten to 40%.



Yep.

Sure. Scandinavians before 5000 years ago were kangz and shiet, right?

[Ygsi]

Nope. Whitness came with Indoeuropeans, whereever you look, it is there. Motala was 81% WHG, what equals to some 70-75% of CM. Rest is an indoeuropean admix, whch in western and northern Scandinavia picked up to 50% and in easten to 40%.



Yep.

Sure. Scandinavians before 5000 years ago were kangz and shiet, right?

[Rethel]

Sure. Scandinavians before 5000 years ago were kangz and shiet, right?

I don't know what that means.

[Ygsi]

I don't know what that means.

You don't know what a kang is?