How do you solve the problem of Evil ?

[Immanenz]

Well I think you can define the objective existence of evil by saying everything that goes against social cohesion is evil (we aren't the only social specie on earth so it is natural and many animals if not all can experience pain/suffering and many can experience sadness/sorrow too)

i actually do thing most humans are concernded for the individual sufferings etc. (at least some basic values, takig out some psychopats), but i think its just developed from the benefit for our sociaties. A lot things are controlled by the subconscious really.

[Celestia]

Evil is something we have created and has changed throughout history based on morals.
Practices that were once ritual and considered normal are now condemned as evil and inhumane. Evil is a loose definition that will constantly change throughout history therefore cannot be solved completely imo.

[Charlemagne7]

Well I think you can define the objective existence of evil by saying everything that goes against social cohesion is evil (we aren't the only social specie on earth so it is natural and many animals if not all can experience pain/suffering and many can experience sadness/sorrow too)

Here we go with the cultural relativism. Whatever goes against the social cohesion doesn't determinate morality in any way. Opposing child sacrifice, slavery and other stuff like that would've been against the social cohesion of certain societies in the past. Does that make opposing those things immoral and supporting them moral? I doubt you think so. And even if you did, all that would mean is that morality is socio-cultural relative and thus not actually objective.

[Hamilcar]

Here we go with the cultural relativism. Whatever goes against the social cohesion doesn't determinate morality in any way. Opposing child sacrifice, slavery and other stuff like that would've been against the social cohesion of certain societies in the past. Does that make opposing those things immoral and supporting them moral? I doubt you think so. And even if you did, all that would mean is that morality is socio-cultural relative and thus not actually objective.

I actually wasn't implying that all evil acts can be linked to social cohesion but many things we consider evil are indeed viewed as such because they are in conflict with it. My point hasn't change though I don't buy this relativism and Evil is an objective reality to me.

[butterburger]

If there is evil to an extent, it means the deity is not omnibenevolent.

[Sebastianus Rex]

God's ways and thoughts are above ours.

In Isaiah 55:8-9 God says
“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
“As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.“

The Bible says there are things, only God alone knows and nobody else.

Deuteronomy 29:29 says
The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.

So questions like why does evil exist, why does anything exist, what was there before there was anything, is there anything after this life.etc are secret things that only God knows.

You realize that was written by men don't you ?

[MechtoidAfalouHG]

You solve evil by killing every living thing on earth via a glorious atomic explosion.

[NSXD60]

If evil benefits certain factions, like the democrats and the news media, they will ignore or minimize it: The burning, looting, maiming and murder by Antifa and BLM in the cities during covid.

[Ford]

Nature in itself isn't evil.

I'd rather say that nature, from a human moral perspective, is inherently evil.

[Gallop]

God is above good and evil, escaping our human comprehension such a position, which is also terrifying for our human understanding. The world is an illusion created by humans in free will and for God it is nothingness, being the renunciation of the world the only way to reach God on Earth.