Do you agree that the following sexual double standards still exist?

[Tooting Carmen]

Yes, and there's nothing wrong with those double standards.

So you wouldn't disown your son if he became a porn star or stripper but would disown your daughter if she did? And nor would you criticise your son if he was unfaithful like you would your daughter? And even as a WN, you'd feel less uncomfortable if your son had a non-white partner than if your daughter did?

[Tooting Carmen]

Not just straight men, most straight women also agree with this assertion.

Bollocks.

[Latinus]

Bollocks.

What? Anyway, to me, these conservative weirdos that support these double standards are just as pathetic as the soy boy types that lick the boots of females.

[Tooting Carmen]

What?

Do you think most straight women would enjoy (or at least tolerate) watching two women kiss more than two men doing so?

[Latinus]

Do you think most straight women would enjoy (or at least tolerate) watching two women kiss more than two men doing so?

Tolerate, yes.

[rothaer]

(1) Yes.
(2) No.
(3) Yes.

If it's really all about double standards is hard to say. Because there might be factually motivated different judgements on men and women. Just an example: If the parents are not a couple, the children regularly stays at their mother. So if a man f-cks around the new child will not be at expence of the resources of the prior children. But if a woman f-cks around, the new child will end up in the same household as the prior and - seen in resources - be at it's expence. I don't want to judge any of these cases, but just remark that the question applied to a man may implicate another situation then the same question applied to a woman.

[Tooting Carmen]

(1) Yes.
(2) No.
(3) Yes.

If it's really all about double standards is hard to say. Because there might be factually motivated different judgements on men and women. Just an example: If the parents are not a couple, the children regularly stays at their mother. So if a man f-cks around the new child will not be at expence of the resources of the prior children. But if a woman f-cks around, the new child will end up in the same household as the prior and - seen in resources - be at it's expence. I don't want to judge any of these cases, but just remark that the question applied to a man may implicate another situation then the same question applied to a woman.

What about no 4, which I added later?

[Anglo-Celtic]

Here's a serious one. A 30-year-old man, who had sex with a 16-year-old girl, won't be treated the same as a 30-year-old woman who had sex with a 16-year-old boy. Both older men and younger boys may even joke about the latter. Should double standards ("where were these hot teachers when I was in high school?") apply in these situations?

[Creoda]

So you wouldn't disown your son if he became a porn star or stripper but would disown your daughter if she did? And nor would you criticise your son if he was unfaithful like you would your daughter? And even as a WN, you'd feel less uncomfortable if your son had a non-white partner than if your daughter did?

Didn't say there's nothing wrong with men doing those things. Of course I would disown/criticise a hypothetical son if they hypothetically did such things. Truthfully, a son race-mixing is less of a problem than a daughter, but would still be disgusting, tragic and a betrayal if they committed to them and had kids.

[Andullero]

And nor would you criticise your son if he was unfaithful like you would your daughter?

There's an added caveat to this in the Third World: When a woman gets knocked up, the onus of raising the kid falls on her parents if the man doing the knocking up chooses to bail out, so there's an added incentive right there for families not to allow daughters to be libertines.