2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 333 Given: 233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
it's too young for proto-Iranians and Mycenaeans. It probably came to the Caucasus during Roman times, and to Greece maybe even later, with the Aromanians.
proto-Celts possible, but it's more likely Romans brought it to England like some other e-v13 subclades.
yeah, maybe this is actually one of the most common Romanian/Moldovan subclades, but we can't know until more people test.
btw. check the live version, you will be placed in your own subclade equally distant from everybody else. And the Romanian and 2 Greeks will form a subclade together.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 333 Given: 233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 333 Given: 233 |
That would make the age of this haplogroup around 2,200 BCE. That's in line with Sintashta which existed 2400–1800 BCE. So it really isn't too young for proto-Iranians. I am just trying to understand the existence of this haplo in Kurds in significant amounts, and even Ossetians, Tajiks, Tatars. Basically everywhere Iranians had a presence.
Also what is the dominant Vlach clade? Do Vlach even carry decent amounts of E-S7461?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
I was talking just about E-Y150909.
Yeah, E-S7461 has that presence in western Asia. It could hardly be from Sintashta though, if that was the case than it would be all over India and the -stan countries. And it's actually all over Europe, but in West Asia too.
Maybe Scythians got it from Dacians, and then spread it to Tatarstan and Caucasus/Middle East. It's distribution in the middle east matches the Scythian invasions well.
nobody knows, Aromanians don't have a DNA project, there is only one Aromanian in the Albanian project, he is E-V13>CTS9320>Z16988>Z27131>BY62310. Probably many of those with a Romanian or Greek flag are actually Aromanian, but we can't know.
here's what Nevgen predictor predicts for Aromanian haplotypes from the Y-DNA study on them, plus that one from the Albanian project.
The prediction isn't 100% reliable.
E1b1b V13>>Z5018> BY167150 14 43.75 E1b1b V13>>Z5018> A2192 9 28.125 E1b1b V13>>Z5017 3 9.375 E1b1b V13>>Z5018> S2979> FGC11457 3 9.375 E1b1b V13>>z5017>> Z19851 1 3.125 E1b1b V13>>Z5017>> Z17264 1 3.125 E-V13>CTS9320>Z16988>Z27131>BY62310 1 3.125
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,886 Given: 26,284 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 333 Given: 233 |
According to live I think I’m actually forming a separate subclade on my own away from those guys lol but it will be for sure when the full results arrive in a couple of days.
Also the Greeks are from Arcadia if I’m not mistaken it’s not a place that was ever occupied by Vlach. I would call myself Vlach if I got Z5018
Thumbs Up |
Received: 333 Given: 233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
More like Dacian imo. I think that Vlachs are tied more to variations of J2 and R1b.
Haplogroup Vlach Albania Vlach Macedonia Constanta (Vlachs) Vlach Avg R1b 14% 25% 33% 24% R1a 2% 18% 2% 10% I2 26% 19% 19% 21% J2 34% 17% 38% 26% E1b1b 17% 19% 7% 16% J1 0% 0% 0% 0% G2a 7% 3% 0% 3% I1 0% 0% 0% 0% N1c 0% 0% 0% 0% T 0% 0% 0% 0% G1 0% 0% 0% 0% Q1 0% 0% 0% 0% E (other) 0% 0% 0% 0% Other 0% 0% 0% 0% Total 58 108 42 208
Haplogroup Oltenia Muntenia Dobrogea Wallachia Transylvania Moldavia Republic of Moldova R1b 15% 15% 18% 15% 19.5% 13% 10.5% R1a 20% 12% 8% 15% 19% 18% 30% I2 26% 23% 38% 25% 25.5% 32% 29% J2 13% 19% 8% 16% 13% 14% 5% E1b1b 15.5% 16% 8% 16% 12% 10% 14% J1 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% G2a 2% 6% 13% 5% 2% 3% 1% I1 5.5% 4% 0% 4% 3% 6% 3.5% N1c 0.5% 1% 5% 1% 2% 2% 3% T 0.5% 1% 0% 1% 2% 0% 2% G1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Q1 0% 0.5% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% E (other) 1% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% Other 0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Total 234 293 39 566 340 191 229
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks