2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 546 Given: 752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 51 Given: 40 |
some Norwegian dude that has never witnessed BLM first-hand thinks they're peace-loving egalitarians, when they're actually violent, black nationalist, Marxists.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 44,387 Given: 31,176 |
Is it the same Norwegian cuck that got ass raped by a Somali migrant and said he feels guilty that his attacker got deported
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,246 Given: 1,444 |
Not really, there are too many scientists involved and ultimate truth has to be deductive instead of inductive hence pure mathematics vs science . Only Fields medals matter. :
Ordinarily, a mathematician does his work alone. Research articles written by two mathematicians are not uncommon but they are greatly in the minority. And articles having more than two authors are quite rare. This should be contrasted with published research in the physical sciences where multiple-authored papers are the norm. In chemistry, for example, you commonly see research articles bearing the names offive or more authors. Here, research is clearly a team effort and the "major investigator" often serves as a kind of "idea person/administrator" whose primary responsibility is to get the project going and see that it is properly funded. The actual research-usually experimental in nature-is carried out by the "team" which may contain a number of graduate students as well as senior level personnel. A mathematician, however, almost always works alone. Unlike the scientist who needs sophisticated laboratory equipment to do his research, the mathematician needs only paper and pencil... --Jerry P. King "The Art of Mathematics"
************************************************** ********************
Prize-worthy?
Prizes are a somewhat awkward fit for science. They usually recognize one or a handful of people as much for their leadership as their science. The projects that are recognized, after all, are typically done by large teams of transient grad students and post-doctoral fellows, who contribute a bit before moving on. And, if you go researching the background of most work, you'll find it involves ideas and materials generated by people who weren't even studying the same problem.
In short, almost all science is a massive endeavor that involves contributions from dozens, if not hundreds, of people, and it's built on a body of knowledge that was assembled by thousands. By picking out just a handful of them to recognize, a prize shortchanges the work of many, many more. And, by typically being limited to honoring one area of research a year and/or specific subject matters, it often leaves out entire fields. The Nobels are especially problematic here, as they focus on the subjects thought to be most important back in the late 1800s.
There are also legitimate questions about whether the Nobels even do a fair job of recognizing the best scientists....
https://arstechnica.com/staff/2019/1...th-the-bother/
Truth is what you find at the end of a correct chain of Mathematical argument :
There is more to the world than science can ever know. In The Golden Bough, Sir James George Frazer said :
34 CHAPTER 2
Yet the history of thought should warn us against concluding that because the scientific theory of the world is the best that has yet been formulated, it is necessarily complete and final as science has supplanted its predecessors, so it may hereafter be superceded by some more perfect hypothesis, perhaps by some totally different way of looking at phenomena-of registering the shadows on the screen-of which we in this generation have no idea.. . . The dreams of magic may one day be the waking realities of science.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 51 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,345 Given: 9,352 |
Black Finns Matter!!! I agree
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,750 Given: 3,189 |
Idiocracy reality becomes more closer and closer to our reality
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,357 Given: 2,487 |
jeez!, BLM nobel peace prize,it's a joke isn't it?
and why not pol-pot or leon trotsky while we are
“the right of peoples to self-determination”
http://sciencenordic.com/
"talking to an asshole is like masturbating with a cheese grinder, it's painful and counterproductive" .Pierre desproges
Thumbs Up |
Received: 333 Given: 233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 44,387 Given: 31,176 |
True story, broski.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-...somali-7712668
Writing for NRK, Nordal Hauken said: "I am a heterosexual man who was raped by a Somalian asylum seeker. My life fell into ruin, but now I feel guilty about him being sent out of the country.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks