0
This is not the place to have yet another dig at Iberians - I was specifically comparing Britain and France here.Both in equal measure. If Brown and Black people fail, it's mostly due to genetic factors. So the differences of economical and social system of their host country will barely change anything to that.
That retarded Portos obviously has not spent his childhood in France, or be educated in a school in France, or even in any school.
Almost no French believe, or have been taught that the French cuisine is the best of have the best literature, or the best wine. But most know, that French are among the best for this and better than Iberans. Not because of French chauvinism, but because these are objective truth, which is even recognised in the Anglosphere. In fact, foreigners are much more prone to praise French culture and be Francophile than French themselves.
Iberians, however, know that they are inferior, and that their history has been failure and mediocrity since at least the 18th century. That's why they are brainwashed since childhood that they are the best and try to denigrate others Western Europeans, in an attempt to cope with ther inferiority complex.
France is on the podium for the best cuisine, and is better than the IP: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/artic...res/index.html https://www.morethanshipping.com/top...-in-the-world/
France is also recognised as the best wine maker nations:
https://all.accor.com/gb/united-king...ns-3c795.shtml
French literature is recognised worldwide as among the best. Unlike the Iberian one, which is more mediocre than Indian and Arabic literature. Their number of significant figures in literature is insignificant compared with the number of significant figures in France. In literature like in others fields. Just look at these thread about literature and which country is the best at it. You will see that France is quoted numerous times, while Iberian countries almost never.
https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/sho....php?t=1119379
https://www.quora.com/Which-culture-...rld-literature
https://www.quora.com/Which-country-...n-your-opinion
https://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-r...-of-literature
https://www.quora.com/Which-European...est-literature
Most French know that there was an American Revolution and an English Revolution before. But the French Revolution had greater impact on the following revolutionary movement in Europe and even in Latin America, and was more an inspiration than the Anglo-Saxons revolutions. So, in that sense, the French Revolution was indeed the mothers of all ones.
Napoléon is absolutely not presented as "the greatest", he is a controversional figure who is disliked and even loathed by a lage part of French from the far-left to the far-right. He is considered as great, yes, because he objectively was, but not as "the greatest". But he was greater than any Iberian who ever existed, that's true.
Almost no French believe that France has won because of the French Resistance. French are not like the Iberians, who are delusional and have been brainwashed since childhood to believe that they could have won the Peninsular War without the help of the Brits or if most of Europe had not coalised against France, despite their troops were so mediocre than they bite the dust countless times against the French, despite their were more numerous than the French and fought on their own ground.
Brits are realistic. That's why they say their food is shit, and also why the French cuisine is recognised in the Anglosphere as among the best of the worlds, and better than Iberian cuisine.
Hooliganism is more a British thing than a French thing. Yes. And that's not a very good point for the Brits. However, when they have been routed by the Germans in 1940 and had to flee to their rainy island while the French were covering their ass it was another story.
Bookmarks