Do you support or oppose a digitized society?

[Rumata]

I work for two state institutions. And also refused to take part in that. Yet nobody brought the coronavirus vaccination to my table. Same goes for my colleagues.

And if your whole institute or both would be spared of "vaccination" it would mean so little on the global scale! I can't believe you don't see it. I can't believe you don't see that they devour one region after another, one age group after another, some professions after others. And the DO come with very harsh conditions including firing from jobs. They do it either officially or unofficially.
Again you write like you ignore all this and you're located in a fairy tale. OK, here's a more extreme example of what is reality of other people now:

In two cities non vaccinated people were forbidden to leave their places of residence with the exception of special cases like visiting a drug store.

Original text in Russian:
Ранее власти округа ввели режим обязательной самоизоляции в двух городах — Югорске и Советском. Не привитым от коронавируса жителям запретили покидать место жительства за исключением особых случаев, в том числе походов в аптеку и выгула домашних животных.
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4909358

-----------------------

Pal, 'they' are scattered in political circles, business owners, military, you name it. They are decentralized as it can be and the only connection they have with each other is competition and blackmailing. There's no unity at any level. One hand doesn't know what the other one does at worst.

Not true at all. So many of them are ruled even if indirectly. The uniform reaction of almost all governmonts to the plandemic is the best proof. The exceptions were a few presidents like those of Tansania and Ghaiti which were killed for revolting the plandemic and NWO. If general guidelines like aknowledging the plandemic are ignored - they kill.

I meant it that way and the point is still the same. Of course they wouldn't be humans to do that, but in order for humans to even judge every suspicious behavior of every other human the software will react to is unrealistic - given our population, it will be too many of those instances and most would be a false alert - which leads to, guess what, loss of profit. The scenario hinted in the video would probably lead to some false accusations. But it may also prevent them. Cops are not your friends, to them you are guilty until proven innocent. This can potentially shut them up early in some of the cases. All that said, I do indeed value privacy, so I don't agree with that stuff. Stated it clearly in my first response. We're ultimately on the same ship pal, but you take it too far.

Software still have a tendency to become more and more sophisticated... And at the same time the can teach you not to do any "suspicious" things just the way they teach you cover your face now.
Concerning "profit", I don't think those who can afford about any material thing in the world care much about size of the profit. I think they rather care about some smart people who potentially can shake their power either now or in the future.

[Arūnas]

When it's for a good cause ok ---> https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/s...buse-qkwztwph6
but what if they have another algorithms, and searching for your naked pics to have so called and used by some secret services "компромат"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kompromat
throw it in the bin all smartphones, tv with cameras or all those Motion Controllers, now!
the end is near

[Rumata]

bump

[Celestia]

100% Opposed

[Rumata]

bump

[SouthDutch7991]

I mean social life hinted in this video
(please, ignore the last episode where an Uygur woman talks about Chinese camps for Uygurs):

Horrifying

[Radimir]

I support it. It's the future and it's inevitable.

[Dragoon]

Less digital and less technology. Already this shit (social media, doxxing, pornography, etc) is ruining some people directly or indirectly. We see the consequences beyond just the individual onto the whole of society: lower birth rates, more depression, less human to human interaction, safe zones and so on).

Having some super powerful computer ai controlling everything could lead to a disaster (like wipe out humanity or enslave them for extended times). Also people in power can abuse it or anyone working for that system.

[Valkyrion]

Technological progress brought undeniable advancement in many aspect of modern human life, such as it's influence in medicine, fast communications and near instant availability of high amount information, but another side of that is reality in which as time passes by, technology becomes stronger and stronger, while humans become weaker due to almost always relying on technology to solve problems, because it's in our nature to take line of least resistance.

High-tech civilization is our inevitable future and there's no point in trying to believe that it could be changed, even though it has it's dark side. Positive things high technology brought us such as deep brain stimulation that can heal Tourette syndrome and AI robots that can do dangerous or extremely difficult jobs instead of humans, by far outweigh all negative aspects.