Why are countries discovered by Anglos more richer than those discovered by Iberians?

[Odelia]

Look at Iberian colonized nations in Latin America, like Venezuela, Mexico, Honduras, Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru, which are hellholes compared to the anglophones like the US, Canada, Australia and NZ.

I'll admit, even our own French colonies aren't the most successful nations, but they're not too bad. But Spanish/Portuguese colonized nations are laughably unsuccessful with poverty, high crime rate (murder and drugs) and poor economy. Maybe Argentina and Uruguay aren't so bad in all fairness. But that isn't saying much.

Oh, the US is more affiliated with the UK (despite being founded by the Spaniards), because the founding forefathers were Anglo-Celtics and most Americans claim English and German ancestry....But really, if the USA became Iberian-ised, it would've been another Mexico, another poor Latin American country.

[Gredos]

Look at Iberian colonized nations in Latin America, like Venezuela, Mexico, Honduras, Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru, which are hellholes compared to the anglophones like the US, Canada, Australia and NZ.

do not compare 2 continents empty of indigenous population (North America and Australia) with the typical colonies.

Compare with Suriname, Guianas, Jamaica, Haiti, etc. These are the poorest countries in America, let's not talk about the ex-British shit holes of Africa or South Asia

[Cristiano viejo]

You should make a thread askin why are countries colonized by Anglos, Spaniards and Portuguese richer than those colonized by France.

[sean]

Why are countries discovered by Anglos more richer than those discovered by Iberians? Look at Iberian colonized nations in Latin America, like Venezuela, Mexico, Honduras, Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru, which are hellholes compared to the anglophones like the US, Canada, Australia and NZ. I'll admit, even our own French colonies aren't the most successful nations, but they're not too bad. But Spanish/Portuguese colonized nations are laughably unsuccessful with poverty, high crime rate (murder and drugs) and poor economy. Maybe Argentina and Uruguay aren't so bad in all fairness. But that isn't saying much.

I know you are trolling, and you've literally got thousands of other Iberian related threads to shit up, why don't you post in an existing thread instead of making a new one for the same exact topic that's in every other thread?

Speaking of Latin America, their societies were fundamentally founded on flawed principals. Loyalty to the Catholic Church, the Crown, and the landlords who used the population to fund their own personal endeavours.

The crown and church no longer have political power so all that's left are landowners and wealthy people who still use the population to fund their own personal endeavours. Even in the Philippines, the ruling class just steals everything and sells out to the highest bidder, and Duterte can't fix the problem.

The elites don't care and never cared about the average citizen. Argentina, for example, is mostly owned by a group of extremely rich people so no money trickles down to the average Argentine. Brazil is ruled by economic barons, as is nearly every country in Latin America.

Half of their population are descendants of slaves who were moneyless and landless until the late 1800's and then denied the ability to earn or have land through systematic discrimination by the ruling class (because why would you want to give up your money and power to a poor peasant?).

This is in stark contrast to the British enlightenment-era system of free and open enterprise for every man with a limited government to let people choose who they support and how they support them.

It takes obedience for civilisation to thrive, but it is very costly for the men in society. So it's not an entirely bad thing they do not develop well. There is a reason why you are the way you are.

A lot of Latin American countries are what's called middle-income trapped. When the cost of labour is no longer cheap and they're no longer attractive to foreign investors. What is the solution? Research and development.

Socialism can't produce innovative products and can only ever function in a high IQ society (Scandinavia for example). Poor brown countries can't do socialism (India for example).

Latin America has suffered from both socialists and capitalists structures and if anything the rise of socialism in the region only comes as a reaction to the failures of unchecked capitalism, and as a reaction to having their own governments sell them out.

Not to mention miscegenation and its consequences have been a disaster for Latin America. They even imported way more negro slaves than US and the Church gave them equal status, leading to way more race-mixing. All this miscegenation went on for centuries and produced the dumbed down population of shitty brown people that occupy Latin America today.

There are billions of brown people in this world anyway, even Europe has millions of Arabs and Turks, the very notion of 'Hispanic' in America for instance is an attempt to conceal the reality of miscegenation having produced a brown slurry of indeterminate function or value, alongside the continued existence of besmirched Iberian lineages.

But the good thing here is Chinese will make brown people suffer as their enslaved playthings for eternity. I'm glad the Chinese will not tolerate them like we did and they'll all get slaughtered with extreme prejudice. China already owns Central America anyway. Democracy is not meant for brown or swarthy people imo.

[Creoda]

[Blondie]

I'll admit, even our own French colonies aren't the most successful nations, but they're not too bad.

Are countries in the east Sahel Region not bad? lol

[Hasien]

Shitholes? Your IQ doesn't really reflect of a European person Frenchie, first of all half of Hispanic American countries are some what ok and decent to live... as long you don't rely on the country minimum wage such as In countries Costa Rica Mexico Colombia Panama Chile Argentina Uruguay Domican Republic.

Second the Anglos committed truly a crime by exterminate all Indigenous people , the Spanish wanted to integrate and Hispanized Amerindians by diluting or mixing their blood by castes..


Third Mexico Is far being a shithole like Jamaica or Hati Mexico Is very Hispanized there's more Spanish contribution In Mexico then what your typical English Is Germanic (Anglosaxon) and we are proud of that..

[Hasien]

I know you are trolling, and you've literally got thousands of other Iberian related threads to shit up, why don't you post in an existing thread instead of making a new one for the same exact topic that's in every other thread?

Speaking of Latin America, their societies were fundamentally founded on flawed principals. Loyalty to the Catholic Church, the Crown, and the landlords who used the population to fund their own personal endeavours.

The crown and church no longer have political power so all that's left are landowners and wealthy people who still use the population to fund their own personal endeavours. Even in the Philippines, the ruling class just steals everything and sells out to the highest bidder, and Duterte can't fix the problem.

The elites don't care and never cared about the average citizen. Argentina, for example, is mostly owned by a group of extremely rich people so no money trickles down to the average Argentine. Brazil is ruled by economic barons, as is nearly every country in Latin America.

Half of their population are descendants of slaves who were moneyless and landless until the late 1800's and then denied the ability to earn or have land through systematic discrimination by the ruling class (because why would you want to give up your money and power to a poor peasant?).

This is in stark contrast to the British enlightenment-era system of free and open enterprise for every man with a limited government to let people choose who they support and how they support them.

It takes obedience for civilisation to thrive, but it is very costly for the men in society. So it's not an entirely bad thing they do not develop well. There is a reason why you are the way you are.

A lot of Latin American countries are what's called middle-income trapped. When the cost of labour is no longer cheap and they're no longer attractive to foreign investors. What is the solution? Research and development.

Socialism can't produce innovative products and can only ever function in a high IQ society (Scandinavia for example). Poor brown countries can't do socialism (India for example).

Latin America has suffered from both socialists and capitalists structures and if anything the rise of socialism in the region only comes as a reaction to the failures of unchecked capitalism, and as a reaction to having their own governments sell them out.

Not to mention miscegenation and its consequences have been a disaster for Latin America. They even imported way more negro slaves than US and the Church gave them equal status, leading to way more race-mixing. All this miscegenation went on for centuries and produced the dumbed down population of shitty brown people that occupy Latin America today.

There are billions of brown people in this world anyway, even Europe has millions of Arabs and Turks, the very notion of 'Hispanic' in America for instance is an attempt to conceal the reality of miscegenation having produced a brown slurry of indeterminate function or value, alongside the continued existence of besmirched Iberian lineages.

But the good thing here is Chinese will make brown people suffer as their enslaved playthings for eternity. I'm glad the Chinese will not tolerate them like we did and they'll all get slaughtered with extreme prejudice. China already owns Central America anyway. Democracy is not meant for brown or swarthy people imo.

Latin american failure's Is due to élites and corrupted governments taking control.

Hispanic american countries were very successful and richer then Anglo America on the time when we were part of the Spanish kingdom.

All Latin american indepent leaders are nothing but criminals to my eyes Including the one from Mexico (Miguel Hidalgo and his team)


We would've remain a common wealth like Canary Island's


Viva la Hispanidad!

[Megadorian]

Latin american failure's Is due to élites and corrupted governments taking control.

Hispanic american countries were very successful and richer then Anglo America on the time when we were part of the Spanish kingdom.

All Latin american indepent leaders are nothing but criminals to my eyes Including the one from Mexico (Miguel Hidalgo and his team)


We would've remain a common wealth like Canary Island's


Viva la Hispanidad!

STFU stop justifying your own flaws and mistakes, Anglos didn't create a trillion mestizos just like Spaniards did

[Hasien]

STFU stop justifying your own flaws and mistakes, Anglos didn't create a trillion mestizos just like Spaniards did

Your Intelligence Is probably the level of an ape, Latin american failure's has nothing to do with race.

Argentina and Uruguay are predominantly white and are third world countries white third world countries, when we were part of Spanish kingdom all Hispanic american territories were first world stablish colonies.


New Spain (Mexico) was richer then 13 colonies (U.S)

Stop quoting me you sub-human If you don't know anything.