1
Actually Parsis might be more Western-shifted than Rors, Jatts but I'm not sure are they up to 95% Caucasoid or not.
You mean Australoids in India? Well actually "Australoids" in India aka AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indian) are genetically pretty distant from Papuans/Melanesians. So I'm not sure if they can even be called Australoids. Even the Paniya, who are the most Australoid-shifted tribe scoring 75% of AASI of their genome, still have around 25% Caucasoid admixture.
Some other tribals like Austroasiatic speaking Mundas who are a mix between AASI and very heavy Mongoloid (Austroasiatic) ancestries have lower Western Eurasian admixture than the Paniya. Some Mundas like the Bonda, Juang can have as low as 7-11% Western Eurasian admixture.
However, there are also Indians who don't have any Caucasoid admixture such as the Andamanese negritos (they look like pygmy version of SSAs) who live in remote islands or Mongoloid tribes of NE India and Sikkim. But they should not actually be considered as "Indian" in terms of race, as they are not South Asians ethnically or genetically.
There are actually data that I can provide but it will take some time to do the runs on G25.
Bookmarks