2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,022 Given: 2,190 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Totally. What Finland should do, we should start development of our own drone fleet. All the infrastructure is there including very advanced state of AI-research. No sense spending ridiculous amount of money on few fighter planes, when with the same money you could have thousands of drones, with which our countless swarms of nerds would have fucking field day.
Drones are modern warfare. Read moar here: https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ed-the-soldier
Last edited by Harkonnen; 09-30-2021 at 06:18 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,022 Given: 2,190 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,435 Given: 1,436 |
Drones are useless against a hi-tec enemy with modern missiles. Cheap drones work against Taliban and not so rich Armenia. Today defence needs capability to destroy object hundreds kilometers inside enemy area and air defence systems. They don't send like Armenians first men and tanks to be destroyed.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
It is pretty asinine Finland is not part of NATO. Currently there are not many countries bordering Russia who are not member of NATO. Finland is one of them. Hypothethically, if I was Russian leader and I wanted to expand my empire, with least amount of possibility of fail, I would pick one of the countries who are not member of NATO. And like said, there are not many of those. The reasonings why is bad idea to join NATO given by our politicians and plebs alike have such acid-fume about them that it is very likely a brain rotting magik lazer beam is directed to their domes straight from Kremlin.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,022 Given: 2,190 |
Lemmi
&
Harkonnen (please, seriously now)
Why do you think Sweden has not joined into NATO?
It is pretty easy to say why Finland has not done that (between 1945 to 1991 that would had been suicide/impossible). But still even after that.
But Sweden?
How much you think Finland has influenced on our/Sweden's decisions? Sweden has not wanted to put Finland into too difficult position? Free Finland is good for Sweden as Sweden does not want get Russia as neighbor. There are also rumors that Cold War time Sweden had guarantee of security given by USA. Not Finland. Perhaps Sweden has that even today (without NATO membership).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,435 Given: 1,436 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,435 Given: 1,436 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Let's say you are right, and in a way you are right that they are unproven against top kek boys. Some experts say they will work just great against top kek, others are doubtful. Let's say doubtful are correct.
So where are we?
We are right here right now BUT we are dealing with novel technology that is constantly improving. If I have chance to be part in early phase of novel technology, I will invest in novel industry ESPECIALLY if traditional thinking does not give me high chance of winning.
In traditional warfare, man against man, those sixty jets are fart in Sahara against Russian Air Force. Our boys would have to perform miracles to top gun the Russian. I guess, miracles are possible, but every sane man understands that odds are not high.
So in this sort of scenario I would invest in novel ways of thinking about warfare, even if there is small chance that the actual output would be worse, as it would not really change the most likely outcome in anyway. But on the other hand novel ways of thinking can sometimes produce ridiculous winning margins contra traditional thinking.
One day we could be building drone fighters, and hell even uncle Elon says F-35's have no chance against it. And I know Elon no five star general but some fools think he's a god or something
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon...20-2?r=US&IR=T
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,797 Given: 26,022 |
Buy SAAB. Good relations with your neighbours is what makes you prosper.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks