Whoa! That's really interesting! I guess somethings came out to be wrong

[rothaer]

I'm likely not asked, but nevertheless: I think they were Belausian-like and came from northwesternmost Ukraine (approximately).

[Abriekman]

Considering that Krakauer Berg had Belarusian-like inhabitants even centuries after the Migration Period - do you still think that Early North Slavs were Ukrainian-like?:

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...o-South-Slavic

In my opinion real proto-Slavs were Ukrainian-like, because Belarusians have a high Baltic admix, anyway there is no big difference between Ukrainians and Belarusians.

[Universe]

Too high Slavic imo. The calculator is not good. Due to lack of alternatives too much non-Slavic (as Germanic and Celtic f. i.) is forced into Slavic assignment. Or the Slavic references are not applicable. The exact reason can be left open. Use this calculator, the exact sources are visible and can be judged:

https://g25vahaduo.genetics.ovh/Feii...calculator.htm

You're probably right, but I think it's not necessary to be that picky here, she just wanted to show that Bosniaks are genetically more Savic than Bulgarians and Serbs, and that's correct.

[Arūnas]

In my opinion real proto-Slavs were Ukrainian-like, because Belarusians have a high Baltic admix, anyway there is no big difference between Ukrainians and Belarusians.

not the Sumer anymore?

https://spadok.org.ua/trypillya/shum...tsyvilizatsiya

[Peterski]

In my opinion real proto-Slavs were Ukrainian-like, because Belarusians have a high Baltic admix, anyway there is no big difference between Ukrainians and Belarusians.

Maybe this supposed Baltic admixture in Belarusians is overestimated and in fact they have less of it. Anyway, check my other thread:

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post7318708



^^^ It seems that Early Slavs were something in-between Belarusians and Ukrainians. At least these samples which I have selected.

[rothaer]

You're probably right, but I think it's not necessary to be that picky here, she just wanted to show that Bosniaks are genetically more Savic than Bulgarians and Serbs, and that's correct.

Yes, Bulgarians abt. 38%, Serbs abt. 48% and Bosnians abt. 55%.

[Vrazijadivizija]

They're really shocking! These three Balkan Slav averages are totally different than we know

Serbian



Bulgarian



Bosniak



Source: @turkic.ethnogenesis

Not really shocking..Serbs are known already to be less Slavic by far than Bosniaks just like Bulgarians.
Part of Bosniaks got our central/east Croat genetics due to Islamization after the Ottoman empire pushed further to regions like Slavonia which heavily destructed the population and moved them to Central/East Bosnia..thats why they re so Slavic shifted,some of them are more in genetics Croat than Croats.
Ofcourse not all Bosniaks are closer to Croats or that they re more Slavic/Germanic shifted..there are still southern Bosniaks who are in range of Serbia,Macedonia,Montenegro etc..

Illyrian theory is stupid and pointless..dont know why people belive that.