Originally Posted by
Blondie
The president is irrelevant, these are just puppets, the deep structure of society and economy does matter, because every president must follow this.
In the liberal democracies, there are tons of factors to prevent the development of dictatorship, these things are completely missing in the social democracies. For example in a liberal country the billionaires influnce the state, so the state will be always weak and can't get absolute power over the society and peoples. Basically the money and the economy is in the private sector. Other factor is the gun permit, what is part basic human rights, so in the liberal state the peoples are better armed than the police, and they can defend themselves. If an american president and his gang would say that "i will be dictator tomorrow" then the peoples would shot them. This is the main reason why USA was not dictatorship, never in the history.
In a social democrat country, the state is more stronger than the billionaires. The economy, money is in the public sector, so the state can influence the peoples as well, and it reduce the level of freedom. It was common that the social democracies turned into communist dictatorship in the history. After the fall of czarist Russia, the peoples wanted social democracy at the begining, but not long after that some leftist radicals led by Lenin took the control. In a social democracy the peoples can't defend themselves from the state, because all weapon are in the leader party's hand, because the unarmed civilians can't do anything against the new dictator. It happened many times in the history.
This is the problem with the EU today, the radical left is gaining more and more influence year by year, and the peoples have no any self defence, because they dependent on the strong government closely in every aspect of life, this thing is very minimal in a liberal democracy, where the peoples are much more independent. So yes the modern totalitarian kultur-marxism spreads everywhere including Europe and North America, but the difference is the USA is based on more stronger democracy, because the complete system is depends on Wall Street and it's capitalism what everyone accept including democrats and republicans. These figures like Trump, Clintons, Biden etc are all came from the Wall Street and they are hardcore anti-marxist. Yes the democrats have this kultur-marxist rhetoric, but its just rhetoric nothing else. The perfect example is the american BLM, what is supported by democrats (in words), but in the background they don't even care them, because if this ghetto black class would be no more, they can't get their votes. Their poverty is the reason why are they voting for democrats because "we will help you" as they say, but it will never be happens. The poverty of blacks is the financially and politically interest of democrats. You cannot change the Wall Street, this is the most important defence line against marxists. The situation in social democracies is very different, because there is social economy model (and strong state) what is pretty close to the ideas of the radical left and the complete country is depends on the economic sector, this is the most important thing which determine and influence everything.
Magyarország
Reply With Quote
Türkiye
Bookmarks