2
Unfortunately that view is not common at all. It's a little skewed but very far from nonsense and your idea of America is just a reinvented one from 1900 or so. That's only a short quarter of the time the culture has formed here, and that culture while not exclusively English is very little other than English, Scottish, and some German. The other contributions pre-1900 are very overstated, of the white population less than 4% was something other than German speaking or English speaking British Isles before the Civil War. And of the roughly 10-15% nonwhites from 1650 until 1960, maybe 1% were not african right up until the massive hispanic migration of the 20th century. Solely English? No, but the English were the progenitors of it and the dominant ethnic group, you could easily say the CORE ethnic group of American identity, for a very very long part of its history. I would argue that even Scottish americans and German americans before a certain time were just there to assimilate into the English ethnicity in America both culturally and genetically. Had the civil war never happened and America remained isolationist as it was meant to, the bulk of the population today would be an English Scottish and German mix, with English as the major component.
THIS, or one of these separately, is what I regard as a "true" american. That and old stock african-americans. So no, to be a real American does not mean exclusively English, but it IS required. Or at least Scottish. I've never seen the U.S. that I consider to really be "america" as anything but that. The other european americans should have assimilated or left, and allowing the formation of their own identity opposed to old-stock americans is probably what really did us in.
Bookmarks