0
I mean, I have explained it actually and pointed it out two times and in my last post asked you to re-read my previous comments as you insist on it. However, after all, I think that you have problems with English. Old Magyars are equal to Proto Magyar in terminology, and Proto-Magyars were Turkic-Uralic confederation with a possible Turkic elite, and with a later addition of other Turkic groups and that group didn't have Germanic shift or whatsoever. You were claiming Old Magyars had it and I corrected it, that was the beginning. (Explaining 3rd time, expecting "you didn't answer " spam in the following post)
Besides, they probably didn't mix with Germanic's in Levedia as well, they were surrounded by Khazar-related Turkic tribes. They were able to find their own space only in Etelköz and after migration to the Carpathia, and they remained in Etelköz for only around 50 years. Mixing might happen in Levedia, still, but surely not in masses. The ones who headed to Etelköz earlier might have mixed there, but a great chunk possibly mixed in the Carpathia.
Turkish sources lead the researches on the Turkic world though, wouldn't eliminate them.Turkish sources are totally irrelevant in Hungary. Sorry i trust in hungarian sources more. Kabars were rather oghur turkic not pechenegs.
It must have said Dnyeper-Don Tisza or something like this then, Atel is literally another form of Attila, and the region first called as such by the Greeks in the form I presented in my previous post. It's not exactly related with Oghuz but Uzes as a mass were already present in that region after one and two centuries. And during Magyar migration, some of Uz clans were together with Pechenegs(who is re-organized Kabars).Bullshit, "köz" means "between" in the hungarian language, hungarians often use it for geography names for example "duna-tisza köze" = "between Duna and Tisza" or "muraköz" = "between Mura" etc etc. So it means oghuzes lived everywhere? O course no, because this term came from magyars.
Bookmarks