Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: Bulgarians and Hungarians closest genetically - Bulgarian academics claim

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    02-23-2022 @ 01:59 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European
    Ethnicity
    Magyar
    Ancestry
    Historic Hungary/Holy Roman Empire
    Country
    Hungary
    Y-DNA
    R-M417 (8700 ybp)
    mtDNA
    H10-a T16093C (9000 ybp)
    Politics
    Green Left
    Religion
    Atheist
    Gender
    Posts
    2,296
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,864
    Given: 444

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    I don't know what new genetic data these researchers were talking about, but in modern days these two people are very distant to each other:

    Distance to: Hungarian
    16.21249518 Bulgarian

  2. #12
    Psarakas Anaximander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    04-03-2024 @ 02:51 PM
    Location
    Athens
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ethnicity
    Hellen-Epirus
    Ancestry
    Hellenic
    Country
    Greece
    Hero
    Pletho Gemistus.
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Posts
    1,829
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 482
    Given: 450

    0 Not allowed!

    Default



    This video couldnt agree more....

  3. #13
    NEW MEMBER Universe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:56 AM
    Ethnicity
    **
    Ancestry
    **
    Country
    Fiji
    Taxonomy
    **
    Religion
    born again atheist?
    Gender
    Posts
    9,994
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 10,006
    Given: 12,236

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    copium

  4. #14
    Veteran Member Blondie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:01 AM
    Location
    Budapest
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Zoomer
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Donau Schwaben
    Taxonomy
    Subnordid
    Gender
    Posts
    17,998
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,276
    Given: 9,859

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaspias View Post
    Rather can be said in the form of "Old Bulgars were Oghurs who left the Hunnic confederation, old Magyars were mixed Oghurs and Uralic speakers with later significant contribution of Pechenegs and Cumans." The Germanic shift occurred because they mixed with Germanic people in Hungary, in their essence they didn't have that shift.
    Wrong, old magyars had very significant germanic genetic before the entering of Carpathian Basin:

    We found that some 40% of the conquerors had East Asian origin, where the geographic origin of the best matching samples nicely corresponded to the region of the ancient Xiongnu empire. Other 40% of the samples had best matches with modern people from Scandinavia, 6 Germany, or other regions in Western Europe. A smaller third group of the samples (6.7%) matched modern samples from the Caucasus region and the Near East.
    According to our data half of the conqueror population had Xiongnu origin, corroborating the statement of medieval Hungarian chronicles, which all declare Hunnic origin of the Hungarians. The conquerors with Scandinavian-German genetic affinity had most probably Ostrogothic origin, as this group was reported to have been integrated into the European Hun Empire hundreds of years before the conquest. Interestingly this European component also support the Hun affinity of the Hungarian conquerors
    http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/e...is_english.pdf

  5. #15
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kaspias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Ankara
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Rumelian
    Ethnicity
    Balkan Turkish, Pomak
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Q-F16045
    mtDNA
    K1a
    Gender
    Posts
    7,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,836
    Given: 7,303

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blondie View Post
    Wrong, old magyars had very significant germanic genetic before the entering of Carpathian Basin:





    http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/e...is_english.pdf
    Samples from the conqueror era =/= conquerors themselves. Ostrogoths are not Proto Magyars, neither Huns, that's the point.

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    02-23-2022 @ 01:59 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European
    Ethnicity
    Magyar
    Ancestry
    Historic Hungary/Holy Roman Empire
    Country
    Hungary
    Y-DNA
    R-M417 (8700 ybp)
    mtDNA
    H10-a T16093C (9000 ybp)
    Politics
    Green Left
    Religion
    Atheist
    Gender
    Posts
    2,296
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,864
    Given: 444

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaspias View Post
    Samples from the conqueror era =/= conquerors themselves. Ostrogoths are not Proto Magyars, neither Huns, that's the point.
    These are samples from conqueror graves, not the commoner population and it's a genetic fact that their mtDNA was significantly North Germanic.

  7. #17
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Turul Karom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last Online
    01-08-2024 @ 05:34 AM
    Ethnicity
    Hungarian
    Country
    Hungary
    Gender
    Posts
    1,853
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,351
    Given: 4,487

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muffinman View Post
    In my opinion, nothing. I was just wondering what you thought of it as a Turanist Hungarian. Eurasianism is a pretty farfetched ideology but there are at least a few convincing arguments for it regardless (e.g., cultural influence from Central Asia). By the way, I do not know too much about neo-Eurasianism/Duginism but I think it's something that can actually gain traction in regions like Central Asia with the West's inevitable demise. China and Turkey are just not one of those regions, and that's troublesome for a Eurasianist.
    Eurasianism in Dugin's context seems just like another form of Russian Imperialism. The Central Asian peoples have been on the back foot since the Great Game in the 1800s (rapid conquest and colonization of Central Asia by the centralized ethnic-nationalists) and have little to do with influencing Russia's current ambitions. I think the word "Eurasian" is just used as a thin cover of paint to disguise it because Russia is majorly in Asia geographically and this gives justification for their continued borders stretching through Central Asia and Siberia.

    Central Asia will get nothing after the fall of the West if it's still dominated by Russia and China. I think that Turkey will be facing its own problems that take it out of the running for any global superpower, too.

  8. #18
    Veteran Member Blondie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:01 AM
    Location
    Budapest
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Zoomer
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Donau Schwaben
    Taxonomy
    Subnordid
    Gender
    Posts
    17,998
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,276
    Given: 9,859

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaspias View Post
    Samples from the conqueror era =/= conquerors themselves. Ostrogoths are not Proto Magyars, neither Huns, that's the point.
    Thanks to prove that you know nothing about magyar conquerors. I have never said that ostrogoths are proto-magyars, but nomad magyars mixed with them a lot, just like almost every steppe nomad population was mixed and multiethnic, these were tribal confederations between various tribes. Nomad magyars originated from huns, and european huns were partly (or mostly) germanic, ostrogothic, only the ruler elite was turkic. The conqueror hungarians who lived in present day Ukraine were germano-turkic mixed. Obviously they assimilated tons of varangians (viking remains) too.

  9. #19
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kaspias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Ankara
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Rumelian
    Ethnicity
    Balkan Turkish, Pomak
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Q-F16045
    mtDNA
    K1a
    Gender
    Posts
    7,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,836
    Given: 7,303

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blondie View Post
    Thanks to prove that you know nothing about magyar conquerors. I have never said that ostrogoths are proto-magyars, but nomad magyars mixed with them a lot, just like almost every steppe nomad population was mixed and multiethnic, these were tribal confederations between various tribes. Nomad magyars originated from huns, and european huns were partly (or mostly) germanic, ostrogothic, only the ruler elite was turkic. The conqueror hungarians who lived in present day Ukraine were germano-turkic mixed. Obviously they assimilated tons of varangians (viking remains) too.
    You're welcome. What I'm pointing out is not nuclear science though, better stop twisting words to put Germanics forward before spending more time for the discussion, it's for your own good.

    And this makes conquerors Germanic shifted because they mixed with Germanics in the region they arrived? Was Xiongnu also Germanic shifted because Attila's Huns mixed with the Germans? We are talking about the origin of them, which is an Uralo-Turkic confederation for Magyars, and they as a whole had no Germanic shift whatsoever before they start mixing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dunai View Post
    These are samples from conqueror graves, not the commoner population and it's a genetic fact that their mtDNA was significantly North Germanic.
    mtDNA's can't be labeled with a certain modern ethnic group, one can only guess the possible source of origin it -just like mine K1a is supposedly from Thracians but were also present in anywhere from Spain to China at the same time- In the context of Steppe, you can't limit it with "North Germanic" label. Nevertheless, the conqueror samples you are pointing out are already mixed communities.

  10. #20
    Veteran Member Blondie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:01 AM
    Location
    Budapest
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Zoomer
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Donau Schwaben
    Taxonomy
    Subnordid
    Gender
    Posts
    17,998
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,276
    Given: 9,859

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaspias View Post
    You're welcome. What I'm pointing out is not nuclear science though, better stop twisting words to put Germanics forward before spending more time for the discussion, it's for your own good.

    And this makes conquerors Germanic shifted because they mixed with Germanics in the region they arrived? Was Xiongnu also Germanic shifted because Attila's Huns mixed with the Germans? We are talking about the origin of them, which is an Uralo-Turkic confederation for Magyars, and they as a whole had no Germanic shift whatsoever before they start mixing.
    It seems you didn't understand what i said. I have talked about conquerors, not proto-magyars. Secondly who are proto-magyars according to you? The elite or the commoners? What time period and what place? I can help you again: the birth place and genetic of proto-magyars are totally unknown. The original home of conquerors was not the Ural for sure, because their genetic origin was more eastern connected to Altay and East Asia:


Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bulgarians: who do you feel closest to?
    By Trun in forum България
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-10-2023, 02:24 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-04-2019, 11:21 PM
  3. Who are closest to Europeans genetically?
    By ChristianMed in forum Race and Society
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 07-04-2018, 07:34 PM
  4. Closest to Hungarians, Italians or Swedes?
    By Dombra in forum Genealogy
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-26-2018, 05:08 PM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 08:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •