Leftists now freaking out about “privilege” and “inequality” … among SQUIRRELS

**wvwvw** · 01-20-2022, 08:47 AM

Leftists now freaking out about “privilege” and “inequality” … among SQUIRRELS
01/19/2022 / By Ethan Huff

The New York Times has published a piece arguing that “privilege” and “inequality” are not just human issues but also animal issues.

Researchers from the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) say that because of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), they decided to probe deeper into “health disparities and other inequalities around the world,” which led them to focus on squirrels.

Apparently the furry rodents suffer from many of the same societal problems that leftists say plague humans. Things like “intergenerational wealth” and “white privilege” are endemic “across so many different species,” says Dr. Jennifer Smith, one of the “scientists” involved with the research.

Smith says it “was quite surprising” to see how animals supposedly face discrimination on the basis of fur color, for instance – and yes, she is dead serious in making this claim.

“We’re just touching the surface,” Smith told the Times, arguing that animals’ survival instincts somehow equate to things like “transphobia” and police abuse against blacks.

Smith explained that some species “share resources such as territory, tools, and shelter between generations,” which in her mind means that they are hoarding generational wealth and depriving animals of color of their fair share.

In the case of the baby red grouses, Smith says that those who are not abandoned by their fathers “are more likely to succeed in establishing their own territories,” while baby squirrels whose mothers hoard food for the winter “are much more likely to survive until the spring.”

“Those young, pine-cone-rich squirrels, the scientists say, are children of privilege,” wrote the Times about these natural phenomena.

The foolish hearts of leftists have been darkened, which is how they come up with this nonsense

Smith and her colleagues say they are eager to expand their “research” into this subject by looking into thousands of other species across the animal kingdom to look for similar patterns.

Upon doing this, they will likely try to force other made-up concepts like “whiteness,” “rape culture,” and “voter suppression” into their observations.

Anything they can find to denigrate people with light skin (mainly Europeans) and blast Caucasian civilization as “problematic” will probably end up in another “study” that gets reported on by the Times as “evidence” of “inequality.”

The Bible warned about all this, by the way. In 2 Corinthians 10:5, Paul the Apostle wrote that in the end times people would become “vain in their imaginations” because “their foolish heart was darkened.”

The way that leftists are constantly trying to read perversion into the animal kingdom – they do this with LGBTQ issues as well, claiming that animals are “gay” and “transgender” to try to normalize these concepts – is one prominent example of this in the modern world.

Remember when liberals tried to claim that calling the police on a black person committing a crime is “racist” and a form of “white privilege?” Yeah, that, too, is an example of foolish, darkened hearts coming up with vain and outlandish ideas.

“Don’t these people have something better to do with their spare time?” asked a commenter at TownHall.

“Napping comes to mind immediately. The main takeaways from all of this are the early bird gets the worm and only the strong survive – without government ‘help.'”

“If your life revolves around trying to prove that an entire race of people is racist, then you are the racist you are looking for,” wrote another.

“The racist most angry minorities see is looking right back at them in their mirror,” said yet another.

https://freebeacon.com/media/animal-privilege/

**~~JamesBond007~~** · 01-20-2022, 09:24 AM

freebeacon ?

Squirells? You don't have to go to squirells to know leftists are morons. Check it out now :

1.) Leftists are by and large liberal art major college graduate retards.

2.) They like the theory of evolution because it supports atheism.

3.) They are too mentally retarded to understand , being liberal arts majors, that they don't understand evolution or that evolution supports racist reality.

Why would one race evolve higher intelligence than another? In terms of strict evolutionary piety, a group under more environmental stress than another will be selected for its ability to figure out solutions—i.e., for intelligence. Proponents of IQ argue that life in cold regions requires more planning, thought, and ingenuity than life in tropical regions where fruit hangs low.

To what extent this is true is not clear to anyone who thinks about it, but the woke don’t. This puts the woke in a position requiring squirming. If they accept Darwinism, then races can differ in intelligence. If they deny Darwin, they find themselves agreeing with Creationists.

The woke have never read Charles Darwin in their life and they don't understand science and mathematics. What is the difference between a poet and scientist ? The scientist knows math and IQ has to do with math but back to evolution you know Charles Darwins' works are in the public domain on gutenberg.org you think woke have read him ? Don't make me laugh :

The great break in the organic chain between man and his nearest allies, which cannot be bridged over by any extinct or living species, has often been advanced as a grave objection to the belief that man is descended from some lower form; but this objection will not appear of much weight to those who, convinced by general reasons, believe in the general principle of evolution. Breaks incessantly occur in all parts of the series, some being wide, sharp and defined, others less so in various degrees; as between the orang and its nearest allies—between the Tarsius and the other Lemuridæ—between the elephant and in a more striking manner between the Ornithorhynchus or201 Echidna, and other mammals. But all these breaks depend merely on the number of related forms which have become extinct. At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,270 will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. --Charles Darwin

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3496...-h/34967-h.htm

A most important obstacle in civilised countries to an increase in the number of men of a superior class has been strongly urged by Mr. Greg and Mr. Galton,238 174namely, the fact that the very poor and reckless, who are often degraded by vice, almost invariably marry early, whilst the careful and frugal, who are generally otherwise virtuous, marry late in life, so that they may be able to support themselves and their children in comfort. Those who marry early produce within a given period not only a greater number of generations, but, as shewn by Dr. Duncan,239 they produce many more children. The children, moreover, that are born by mothers during the prime of life are heavier and larger, and therefore probably more vigorous, than those born at other periods. Thus the reckless, degraded, and often vicious members of society, tend to increase at a quicker rate than the provident and generally virtuous members. Or as Mr. Greg puts the case: “The careless, squalid, unaspiring Irishman multiplies like rabbits: the frugal, foreseeing, self-respecting, ambitious Scot, stern in his morality, spiritual in his faith, sagacious and disciplined in his intelligence, passes his best years in struggle and in celibacy, marries late, and leaves few behind him. Given a land originally peopled by a thousand Saxons and a thousand Celts—and in a dozen generations five-sixths of the population would be Celts, but five-sixths of the property, of the power, of the intellect, would belong to the one-sixth of Saxons that remained. In the eternal ‘struggle for existence,’ it would be the inferior and less favoured race that had prevailed—and prevailed by virtue not of its good qualities but of its faults ” --Charles Darwin

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3496...-h/34967-h.htm

^ that just a few small choice samples also what the wokerati who say race doesn't exist or doesn't really matter ? LULZ :

We will first consider the arguments which may be advanced in favour of classing the races of man as distinct species, and then those on the other side. If a naturalist, who had never before seen such beings, were to compare a Negro, Hottentot, Australian, or Mongolian, he would at once perceive that they differed in a multitude of characters, some of slight and some of considerable importance. On inquiry he would find that they were adapted to live under widely different climates, and that they differed somewhat in bodily constitution and mental disposition. If he were then told that hundreds of similar specimens could be brought from the same countries, he would assuredly declare that they were as good species as many to which he had been in the habit of affixing specific names. This conclusion would be greatly strengthened as soon as he had ascertained that these forms had all retained the same character for many centuries; and that negroes, apparently identical with existing negroes, had lived at least 4000 years ago.286 He would also hear from an excellent observer, 218 Dr. Lund,287 that the human skulls found in the caves of Brazil, entombed with many extinct mammals, belonged to the same type as that now prevailing throughout the American Continent. --Charles Darwin

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3496...-h/34967-h.htm

Lets be real mathematicians and most scientists have higher IQs than woke retards who took a little math in school and swore to never touch it again and just do poetry or some humanistic bullshit.