1
This is the most pathetic and in the same time truly autistic argument that I read in quite a while. Are you that blind to see that the authors of this present study I based this thread upon was written by the same scientific team from MKI than the one you posted in the first link. This 2022 study overwrites the previous conclusion this very same team has made in 2017. Surprise-surprise, actually science keeps reassessing their conclusions in the result of new discoveries. But how would such a very troubled mind like you even understand the 101s of science. I will quote it again so maybe you will actually give a damn to read what was the conclusion of the current paper:
"The “immigrant core” of the conquering Hungarians derived from an earlier admixture of Mansis, early Sarmatians and descendants of late Xiongnus. In addition, we detected shared Hun-related ancestry in numerous Avar and Hungarian conquest period genetic outliers indicating a genetic link between these successive nomadic groups. Aside from the immigrant core groups we identified that the majority of the individuals from each period were local residents, harboring “native European” ancestry"
"From proximal sources Conq_Asia_Core1 could be consistently modelled from 50% Mansi, 35% Early/Late Sarmatian and 15% Scytho-Siberian-outlier/Xiongnu/Hun ancestries, and Conq_Asia_Core2 had comparable models with shifted proportions"
This is very easy English, you can't possibly get its meaning wrong if you read it slowly, try to do so. It is absolutely clear that the main genetic "ingredient" for Hungarian Conquerors were Ugric, Iranian and Turkic people. They also best can be modeled as half Ugric, 1/3 Iranian and 15% Turkic. Genetics simply don't lie, these are the actual finds. You can twist it and bring your own delusional narrative as you want but the hard data is what I just quoted from the article.
Bookmarks