1
Assuming that a French North America would be full of blacks like Haiti is showing big ignorance on history. Amerindians in Haiti were scarce and got extinct when Haiti belonged to Spain, and French were relatively friendly and well behaved with North American Amerndians. Also, French didn't colonized tropical lands (like Haiti), which they only used them like plantation colonies, in the same way as they colonized temperate lands, which they used them more like settlement colonies. Is a similar situation like with British colonies, which were colonized like exploitation/plantation colonies when they were tropical lands, and more like settlement colonies when they were in temperate latitudes.
French, however, were more friendly and respectful with North American Amerindians, in contrast to British colonist who annihilated them. So, in my opinion, a French North America wouldn't be as white as Australia or Canada, but would still be highly French/European, but instead of being mainly only white-European, its population would be like a mix of full/near whites mostly of French descent, Metis (French/Amerindian mixed people in diverse proportions), and a significant minority of full/near full Amerindians. It would be like a French version of a Latin American country with many Euro/Amerindian mixed people, but also a high degree of Euro ancestry. Like a northern and French version of the southern cone, so to speak.
Edit: forgot to add that the current population of the eastern coast would probably be an Anglo/French mix, and with strong catholic presence, but also many protestants who would have resisted from converting to Catholicism.
Bookmarks