Martin scale tables

[cass]

Please do not spam and post only valuable data, prefearbly with sources and the sample size.

Sibling thread for Bunak scale data






Poles avg, source Gorny 72








source Bunak ?

males only
Russians various regions
Mari
Votyaks
Belorussians (Mogilev)

+added Russian avg
+Poles from Gorny

[Russki]

What I've got from Lucas

[Russki]

What a shitty chart...

8 and 11 are the same color.

9 and 10 and clearly lighter than 11.

The separation between 12 and 13 is not clear and they went to different categories (5-12 and 13-16).

[cass]

Could you refrain from spamming please. Martin scale only. Please open discussion in different thread if you wish.

[cass]

Moravians (students) source:ŠVÁBOVÁ, V. (2012). Barva očí brněnských vysokoškoláků (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta).







Added 1-7/ 8-16 split requested by Supercomputer
https://i.ibb.co/6RGfC7H/czech-mod.jpg

[Supercomputer]

Moravians (students) source:ŠVÁBOVÁ, V. (2012). Barva očí brněnských vysokoškoláků (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta).

So Moravians (Czechs) are 61% blue and grey (9-16) eyed. If we add number 8 (189 cases) that comes up to 12,6% giving us a total of 73,6% light and light-mixed eyes (8-16). Not very far from what I found on Czech parliament and very far from the 1982 study on Czechs that showed only 57% eyes 8-16.

[Russki]

So Moravians (Czechs) are 61% blue and grey (9-16) eyed.

11 is light mixed.

Blue + Grey combined come at 44% without number 11.

[Supercomputer]

11 is light mixed.

Blue + Grey combined come at 44% without number 11.

This version is not. That's why I hate these scales. Not only are they inconsistent, but even two versions of the same scale are different.

But even if blue and grey are only really 44% doesn't change the fact that if you include light mixed it comes up to 73%

[Russki]

This version is not. That's why I hate these scales. Not only are they inconsistent, but even two versions of the same scale are different.

But even if blue and grey are only really 44% doesn't change the fact that if you include light mixed it comes up to 73%

Well, your own study with a much bigger sample size came at 67,3%.

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...-Senate-study)

Now we have two different studies from Czechoslovak anthropologists who came at 57% and 73%.

Make averages between Czechoslovak anthropologists I guess (65%), or rely on your own 67,3%.

Germany is at 68,7% and XP correctly mentioned that Czech-German border areas are the darkest in Germany, so even 67,3% is generous.

[Supercomputer]

Well, your own study with a much bigger sample size came at 67,3%.

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...-Senate-study)

Now we have two different studies from Czechoslovak anthropologists who came at 57% and 73%.

Make averages between Czechoslovak anthropologists I guess (65%), or rely on your own 67,3%.

Germany is at 68,7% and XP correctly mentioned that Czech-German border areas are the darkest in Germany, so even 67,3% is generous.

It's not a bigger sample size. My study was on 262 people, while this study from 2012 is on 1493 people.