Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Prince Andrew settlement allows royals to keep calm and carry on

  1. #1
    Veteran Member PHDNM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    04-25-2024 @ 04:20 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic
    Ethnicity
    French
    Country
    France
    Gender
    Posts
    12,415
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,124
    Given: 1,884

    1 Not allowed!

    Default Prince Andrew settlement allows royals to keep calm and carry on

    Prince Andrew settlement allows royals to keep calm and carry on

    Feb 16, 2022

    The settlement announced Tuesday between Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre allows Britain's monarchy to "move on", just as Queen Elizabeth II celebrates a landmark 70th year on the throne, royal commentators said.

    Andrew, 61, has opted against pursuing a jury trial in the US civil case brought against him by Giuffre, who alleges he sexually assaulted her in 2001 when she was 17 and a minor under American law.

    Instead, he has agreed to make a "substantial donation" to a charity established by Giuffre that supports sex trafficking victims, and will no longer be questioned under oath by her lawyers.

    However, he continues to deny all the accusations against him.

    https://www.news24.com/channel/gossi...ry-on-20220216
    POUR UNE HISTOIRE DÉBARRASSÉE DES NOMBREUX MENSONGES
    Vincent Reynouard: Je suis ingénieur chimiste et historien révisionniste français. J’expose de la façon la plus pédagogique possible les arguments révisionnistes. Je propose, j’expose, je n’impose rien. Chacun doit (ou devrait) être libre de se faire une opinion sur le sujet. .


  2. #2
    Aging Tom Cat Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Mopi Licinius Crassus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    chester
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Iberian, Celtic, Germanic
    Ethnicity
    caucasian
    Ancestry
    Northern England, SE Ireland, Northern Ireland, Castilla Spain
    Country
    England
    Y-DNA
    R-DF27 (R1b1a2a1a2a) R-Y3267
    mtDNA
    H6A1B
    Gender
    Posts
    4,955
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,015
    Given: 10,635

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    clearly he banged her

    she was 17 at the time, so although illegal, he's not a pedo as she was not pre-pubescent

    this woman is no angel either it should be said

    tbh the "payoff" looks bad on both of them imo

  3. #3
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Irish
    Ancestry
    Ireland
    Country
    Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    17,759
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 25,594
    Given: 29,041

    9 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mopi View Post
    clearly he banged her

    she was 17 at the time, so although illegal, he's not a pedo as she was not pre-pubescent

    this woman is no angel either it should be said

    tbh the "payoff" looks bad on both of them imo
    He was a middle aged man who if he had any moral compass would not be involved with a 17 year old girl who was there just for sexual purposes. There were a lot younger girls involved in this sex for hire and trafficking. It is all a very tacky and dirty business. Dirt like that will stick. He had to pay her off as imagine how he would go under questioning from her lawyers? He didn't do very well in his interview so he most probably took the best option available to him under the circumstances. None of this is good for the Royal Family.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Irish
    Ancestry
    Ireland
    Country
    Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    17,759
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 25,594
    Given: 29,041

    4 Not allowed!

    Default

    Also interesting is that none of the men involved in this are behind bars. So far only a woman has been convicted. Not saying she shouldn't be where she is but what about all the men involved?

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Ylla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Last Online
    Today @ 11:35 AM
    Ethnicity
    ᖭི༏ᖫྀ
    Ancestry
    Albanian
    Country
    Great Britain
    Gender
    Posts
    5,913
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,666
    Given: 10,200

    5 Not allowed!

    Default

    A 17 year old is a little girl. How can a grown man even consider having sex with a girl so young without feeling disgust. Just disgraceful in every way.

  6. #6
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 06:49 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    insan
    Ethnicity
    @
    Country
    Antarctica
    Gender
    Posts
    3,060
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,748
    Given: 9,036

    4 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mopi View Post
    ...
    Those who are trying to justify this shit are not less disgusting. Fuck, that was a pedo and rape trade, there is nothing to misunderstand nor I can understand how someone can downplay this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ylla View Post
    A 17 year old is a little girl. How can a grown man even consider having sex with a girl so young without feeling disgust. Just disgraceful in every way.
    His daughters were of the the same age when this all happened. Imagine you as father abuse girls who could be your daughters. Disgusting, abusing underage person is something which destroys every social convention of civilized structures, not only national law. The Queen should punish him publicly.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Celestia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Cajun
    Ancestry
    Anglo Cajun
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    13,898
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24,249
    Given: 16,012

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ylla View Post
    A 17 year old is a little girl. How can a grown man even consider having sex with a girl so young without feeling disgust. Just disgraceful in every way.
    Agreed… the emotional immaturity of a female at this age is what sickens me the most. (most) are very easy to manipulate, control and are overall vulnerable. I imagine this is exactly why grown men go after them. Barf.
    What’s done in darkness will come to light

  8. #8
    Administrator Hithaeglir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ethnicity
    Greek
    Country
    England
    mtDNA
    U2e1
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Gender
    Posts
    8,639
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,274
    Given: 5,610

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    A complete oxymoron, accepting the money of a sex offender to support victims of sexual abuse I would have preferred him going through the trial tbh.

  9. #9
    Sup? Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Colonel Frank Grimes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Spanish
    Ethnicity
    Galician
    Country
    United States
    Region
    West Virginia
    Y-DNA
    Powerful Male
    mtDNA
    Powerful Female
    Politics
    Of the school of Ron Jeremy
    Hero
    Your mom
    Religion
    Rationalist Materialism
    Gender
    Posts
    25,006
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 25,038
    Given: 12,806

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley View Post
    Also interesting is that none of the men involved in this are behind bars. So far only a woman has been convicted. Not saying she shouldn't be where she is but what about all the men involved?
    Maxwell has dirt on the numerous men that have been blackmailed for sleeping with underage women. Why go after someone like former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson at the same time as Maxwell when all that anyone has on Richardson is an accusation? With Prince Andrew, there wasn't just an accusation but a photo confirming he knew Roberts. Now there is a possibility of Maxwell throwing men like Richardson under the bus by offering her better treatment in prison in exchange.

    She won't, obviously, throw under the bus big fish like Wexner. Wexner is too high up the food chain. You'll only get the small fish.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ylla View Post
    A 17 year old is a little girl. How can a grown man even consider having sex with a girl so young without feeling disgust. Just disgraceful in every way.
    A 17 year old is not a child. It wasn't unusual for a 17 woman to be married a century ago. There were 17 year old men fighting in WW2, Korea, and Vietnam.

    The real issue is that she was sex trafficked. Prince Andrews is a piece of shit but he's not a pedophile. Epstein was a pedophile. While he was confined back in 2008 (he was allowed to leave his cell during the day to go out and conduct business cuz, you know, that makes sense...) he would receive girl's panties and you can imagine what he would do with them. So, yeah, he was a pedo.

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Ylla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Last Online
    Today @ 11:35 AM
    Ethnicity
    ᖭི༏ᖫྀ
    Ancestry
    Albanian
    Country
    Great Britain
    Gender
    Posts
    5,913
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,666
    Given: 10,200

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel Frank Grimes View Post
    Maxwell has dirt on the numerous men that have been blackmailed for sleeping with underage women. Why go after someone like former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson at the same time as Maxwell when all that anyone has on Richardson is an accusation? With Prince Andrew, there wasn't just an accusation but a photo confirming he knew Roberts. Now there is a possibility of Maxwell throwing men like Richardson under the bus by offering her better treatment in prison in exchange.

    She won't, obviously, throw under the bus big fish like Wexner. Wexner is too high up the food chain. You'll only get the small fish.



    A 17 year old is not a child. It wasn't unusual for a 17 woman to be married a century ago. There were 17 year old men fighting in WW2, Korea, and Vietnam.

    The real issue is that she was sex trafficked. Prince Andrews is a piece of shit but he's not a pedophile. Epstein was a pedophile. While he was confined back in 2008 (he was allowed to leave his cell during the day to go out and conduct business cuz, you know, that makes sense...) he would receive girl's panties and you can imagine what he would do with them. So, yeah, he was a pedo.
    A lot of things that happened a century ago are frowned upon today. At 17 all girls think they're mature, know it alls but matter of fact is that they're still naive little girls who are not ready to make the right choices and rely on ADULTS to protect them.
    Last edited by Ylla; 02-16-2022 at 08:41 PM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Psychology of Prince Andrew
    By The Lawspeaker in forum United Kingdom
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-04-2019, 07:07 PM
  2. The TRUTH About Jeffrey Epstein & Prince Andrew
    By Kamal900 in forum Politics & Ideology
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-03-2019, 04:26 PM
  3. Prince Andrew could end up as a 'prince in exile'
    By The Lawspeaker in forum United Kingdom
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-24-2019, 07:41 AM
  4. Haemus Royals Prepare for Prince William's Wedding
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum News Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2011, 10:51 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2009, 08:28 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •