0
I don't know if was already discussed but what's the reason individual samples, for e.g. from Croatia because have them at hand, have such Vahaduo K13 distance where are closest to "Croat_Bosnia":
Distance to: RG
1.97208012 Croat_Bosnia
2.03388790 Croat_Slavonia
2.23008968 Croat_Herzegovina
2.27530218 Croat_Southern
2.59792225 Croat_Istria
2.63294512 Bosniak
2.91192376 Serb_NorthEastBosnia
2.91849276 Croat_Dalmatia
2.95428502 Croat_Lika
3.03103943 Romanian_Moldavia_North
3.17102507 Bosniak_Krajina_West
3.23069652 Serb_CentralCroatia
3.25024614 Romanian_North
3.33393161 Serb_WestSerbia
3.40797594 Bosniak_Southeast
3.83605266 Croat
3.84108058 Serb_Lika
4.04990123 Serb_BosanskaKrajina
4.10195076 Croat_Kvarner
4.18637074 Serb_CentralSerbia
4.26313265 Moldovan_Central
4.26313265 Moldovan_Central
4.39130960 Bosniak_Central_Northeast
4.53995595 Moldovan_North
4.53995595 Moldovan_North
but on Vahaduo Custom PCA are closer to "Bosniak_Krajina_West"?
As if current Custom PCA (X : PC1, Y : PC2) favors more Southern-Eastern plot. Such things with distance did happen before but weren't so significant. I also see slight differences compared to the plot of some Croatian regional averages in comparison to a few weeks ago. Are some, maybe new, Bigger/Smaller Regions population references influencing plot accuracy and should be removed from "Source"? Should use a different "PC" combination?
Bookmarks