0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,203 Given: 9 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,203 Given: 9 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 36 Given: 32 |
Southern Italy was also settled by Illyrians. Got this from Eupedia:
Yeah, it's pretty much shaping like J2b-L283 subclades played an important role in the ethnogenesis of the Illyrians, just like some of us predicted some time ago and before we had all these aDNA samples.
Actually, since this Iapygian/Messapian sample (NEO806) is Y21878+ he is closer to the Hoti clan, who are under CTS11100>Y166564, and the FT29003 cluster observed in southeastern Gegëria which user Archetype0ne belongs to.
The Kastrati clan are under PH4679>>PH1751, so like Krasniqi/Nikaj clans and meBoardman & Sollberger 1982, p. 231: "Apart from the spears and spear-heads of 'South-Illyrian' type (...), a connexion can be traced between Albania and Italy through various features in the pottery (shapes, handles; later on also painted geometric decoration); for although in Albania they derive from an earlier local tradition, they seem to represent new elements in Italy. In the same way we can account for the fibulae – typically Illyrian – arching in a simple curve with or without buttons, which one finds in southern Italy and in Sicily, and also some in which the curve is decorated with 'herring-bone' incisions, like examples from the eastern coast of the Adriatic. These influences appear finally in the rites of burial in tumuli in the contracted position, which are seen at this period in southern Italy, especially in Apulia. There is also evidence, as we have seen elsewhere, for supposing that in the diffusion of these Illyrian influences in Italy the Illyrian tribes which were displaced at the beginning of this period from the South-Eastern sea-board of the Adriatic and passed over into Italy may have played a significant role."; Wilkes 1992, p. 68: "...the Messapian language recorded on more than 300 inscriptions is in some respects similar to Balkan Illyrian. This link is also reflected in the material culture of both shores of the southern Adriatic. Archaeologists have concluded that there was a phase of Illyrian migration into Italy early in the first millennium BC."; Fortson 2004, p. 407: "They are linked by ancient historians with Illyria, across the Adriatic sea; the linkage is borne out archaeologically by similarities between Illyrian and Messapic metalwork and ceramics, and by personal names that appear in both locations. For this reason, the Messapic language has often been connected by modern scholars to Illyrian; but, as noted above, we have too little Illyrian to be able to test this claim."
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,920 Given: 1,564 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,920 Given: 1,564 |
Prove it, all the evidence is stacked against you.
We are all ears, bring forth the genetic evidence, the uniparentals (Y-DNA specifically), the ethnography, the linguistics.
What are you waiting for.
Prove "mainland Greeks" are not Balkan transplants (9-10th+ century A.D. at best).
Islanders, regardless of the circumstances, plot the closest to BA/IA samples, so they already scored, ball is in your court.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 36 Given: 32 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,203 Given: 9 |
The samples available so far are 4 Mycenaeans from the Peloponnese dated between 1346 and 1300 BC, and 2 Emporiote Greeks from Spain dating back to 576 and 276 BC. Despite being separated by 1000 years apart, these samples are genetically similar to each other and their Steppe percentage ranges from 2 to 14% in Davidski's classic models.
Code:Target: Iberia_Northeast_Empuries2:I8215___BC_576___Coverage_72.08% Distance: 2.2301% / 0.02230102 68.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N 16.6 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 14.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 0.2 Han Target: Iberia_Northeast_Empuries2:I8208___BC_276___Coverage_32.97% Distance: 3.8103% / 0.03810281 66.0 Anatolia_Barcin_N 25.8 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 6.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 0.6 MAR_Taforalt 0.4 Han 0.4 IRN_Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA2:I8728 Target: GRC_Mycenaean:I9041___BC_1300___Coverage_36.06% Distance: 2.4801% / 0.02480062 66.4 Anatolia_Barcin_N 17.0 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 13.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 1.8 Levant_PPNB 0.8 Han 0.6 Dinka 0.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N Target: GRC_Mycenaean:I9033___BC_1346___Coverage_21.63% Distance: 3.8248% / 0.03824810 60.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N 19.6 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 14.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 1.8 Dinka 1.2 Gambian 0.8 IRN_Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA2:I8728 0.8 WHG 0.4 ETH_4500BP 0.4 Han Target: GRC_Mycenaean:I9010___BC_1300___Coverage_21.05% Distance: 3.1315% / 0.03131470 69.2 Anatolia_Barcin_N 13.4 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 6.2 Levant_PPNB 4.8 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N 3.0 WHG 2.0 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 0.8 Jarawa 0.6 IRN_Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA2:I8728 Target: GRC_Mycenaean:I9006___BC_1333___Coverage_31.39% Distance: 3.1558% / 0.03155833 68.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N 20.2 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 8.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 2.4 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N 0.2 BRA_LapaDoSanto_9600BP 0.2 Nganassan
Then there are these samples coming out in the future, the bulk of which should plot with the aforementioned samples.
G25 Ancients: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0q39l...dleco&e=3&dl=0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,431 Given: 241 |
Did the samples from the 2,000 BCE Aegeans also absorbed Slavic admixture? Cause I overlap with them. And if I remember correctly I also overlap almost with a ”Thracian” sample from Bulgaria and an Etruscan sample from Italy. Etruria was inhabited by a number of Greek tribes besides the dozens of others, and Bulgaria too.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks