Do you agree that there is something akin to a "sexual-racial double standard"?

[Tooting Carmen]

By this, I mean that women who date or marry out of their (real or imaginary) ethnicity or nationality are usually shunned and even punished much more than men who do so. Even in the Jim Crow South and Apartheid-era South Africa, by and large White male-Black female relationships were punished rather less harshly than were Black male-White female relationships. For that matter, it is observable how particularly in MENA and South Asian diaspora populations in Europe, whereas women from those groups who even lay eyes on a White or Black man are rather often shunned, beaten or even sometimes murdered by their own relatives, on the other hand it is a kind of open secret how many men from those groups have affairs with White women (even when their actual wife is MENA/South Asian), and in some of the more 'adventurous' cases even affairs with Black women.

[NSXD60]

Women have a limited egg viability supply, men produce fertile sperm daily until they die, so, women have responsibility over whether or not a race will survive. Negatively, women can devolve their race's future, and, conversely, men can help to evolve another. This worked out well until natives of colonies were allowed to migrate to the countries that ruled them.

[mitalit]

[sean]

Do you agree that there is something akin to a "sexual-racial double standard"? By this, I mean that women who date or marry out of their (real or imaginary) ethnicity or nationality are usually shunned and even punished much more than men who do so.

Why are you recycling the same threads?

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ds-still-exist

Even in the Jim Crow South and Apartheid-era South Africa, by and large White male-Black female relationships were punished rather less harshly than were Black male-White female relationships.

Source?

Considering that segregation in public accommodations was the law of the land, I don't think black/white interracial relationships ever existed. Even Loving v. Virginia was only 55 years ago. Actual social acceptance of interracial relationships didn't follow for another 30 years. And coal burners are shunned even today.

For that matter, it is observable how particularly in MENA and South Asian diaspora populations in Europe, whereas women from those groups who even lay eyes on a White or Black man are rather often shunned, beaten or even sometimes murdered by their own relatives, on the other hand it is a kind of open secret how many men from those groups have affairs with White women (even when their actual wife is MENA/South Asian), and in some of the more 'adventurous' cases even affairs with Black women.

Simply because browns are universally repulsive to all races of women. Tribalism/caste system is the only thing keeping them from roping. Their societies turned patriarchal once they settled down and adopted settled civilisation. So they cannot comprehend a woman refusing them. They all deep down agree women should be restricted in rights. They put a burqa on their heads, marry their cousins for a reason. There is no double standard here.

[Tooting Carmen]

Why are you recycling the same threads?

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ds-still-exist

Because I wanted to dedicate a particular thread to this in its own right, rather than the previous thread which was a more general 'oppression of women' thread.

Source?

Considering that segregation in public accommodations was the law of the land, I don't think black/white interracial relationships ever existed. Even Loving v. Virginia was only 55 years ago. Actual social acceptance of interracial relationships didn't follow for another 30 years. And coal burners are shunned even today.

LOL of course interracial relationships always existed in the US (and even South Africa). And while I am not sure of actual stats about this, nevertheless it was a semi-open secret how even some of the toughest-talking pro-Jim Crow and pro-Apartheid politicians in the two countries had Black lovers, such as Strom Thurmond. Also, even To Kill A Mockingbird features a White man married to a Black woman. Although he is still partially shunned by the Whites in his town, he pretends to be an alcoholic and is thus 'excused' for his choice of wife, whereas the very raison d'etre of the book was to show how it was no holds barred when a White woman and Black man laid eyes on one another.

[sean]

LOL of course interracial relationships always existed in the US (and even South Africa). And while I am not sure of actual stats about this, nevertheless it was a semi-open secret how even some of the toughest-talking pro-Jim Crow and pro-Apartheid politicians in the two countries had Black lovers, such as Strom Thurmond.

Strom Thurmond fucked his black maid, who gives a fuck. Not all Southerners were cucks like Richard Loving either (who made interracial marriage legal all over the country because of his jungle fever).

Interracial marriage has been legal in atleast some states long before Jim Crow was over turned. But still race-mixing wasn't normal or commonplace, because there have been plenty of clearly observable systemic factors which kept the races segregated going beyond the obvious Jim Crow era (wealth inequality, inaccessibility to workplaces to name a few).

A lot of what people found attractive those days is based on who they identified with in personal life, their parents, relatives and they typically wanted themselves and upbringing reflected in their partner. The laws mainly just existed to deprive mongrels like you a place in white society generally, also to deprive the mixed-race woman of alimony and property thus discouraging interracial relationships with white people.

Also, even To Kill A Mockingbird features a White man married to a Black woman. Although he is still partially shunned by the Whites in his town, he pretends to be an alcoholic and is thus 'excused' for his choice of wife, whereas the very raison d'etre of the book was to show how it was no holds barred when a White woman and Black man laid eyes on one another.

What? The entire book is a fucking farce tailored specifically to be used as liberal propaganda. It's one of those books that's only well-known because it's required reading in every single school in America. The entire premise of the story is so hilariously outlandish. Negroes are portrayed as innocent creatures that good Whites must protect because they're incapable of protecting themselves (the book was based on Scottsboro Trial where two literal white prostitutes made up a tale of negro men raping them so that they wouldn't suspect they were prostitutes, but in the book it was actually a white girl from the South in 1930 who, for absolutely no real reason, wants to fuck a negro with a crippled arm).

Not to mention the eye-rolling stereotypes of the White Southerners all being irrational frothing idiots while the Blacks are all poor innocent boys being oppressed. The book was edited by liberal yankee Tay Hohoff who probably shoehorned in a bunch of Aesop's bullshit. Probably why the story sounds like a caricature of what a northerner thinks the south is like (Atticus Finch's character was probably shoved in to represent progressive Civil Rights era egalitarianism in 1930's Deep South although he favoured segregation and was not a liberal in the original draft).

[Insuperable]

Because I wanted to dedicate a particular thread to this in its own right, rather than the previous thread which was a more general 'oppression of women' thread

And why is it that you want to dedicate a particular thread to this? What is it that you want to hear or not hear? What is your goal?

[Mortimer]

I agree women have always been sexually more restricted then men still are in some cultures but in the west through positive discrimination and political correctness it can sometimes be reverse like White men who date asian women are predators or losers but women who date blacks are empowered and liberated

[Tongio]

We live in the least sexualy restrictive times for woman.We should be worried instead about the rising numbers of sexless adult men and how they are going to behave in a society where they have no reward only bashing.

[Hektor12]

Sexual double standard begins with birth, you know women are weak. It shouldnt be surprising that "weak is more tolerated".