Are the Germanics the most racist European group of all?

[rothaer]

I mean saying that Germans are racist is racist in itself, but who can disagree with such an obviously true statement?

Yes.

And elaborating why, would be even more racist.

[Cristiano viejo]

Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, Suebis, Saxons and Franks were not at all.

[TTRS]

Yes, in the past.

Nowadays are mongrels

[Ruggery]

English xenophobia towards the Irish and German xenophobia towards the Poles were not mutually related, so making it a collective Germanic guilt doesn't make any sense.

Historically yes. You can see that in behaviour of Germanic tribes, they separated themselves from conquered natives who were in other "caste" that didn't mix with them.
Slavs were nothing like that but freed and mixed with their slaves.

Today Germanics are least racist, but it is artificial in their character.

But it is that historically if they have been like this and they have not been only exceptions there are many cases, for example the Romans came to accept Germanics among their army in fact there came a time when they opened the doors to them. On the other hand, many Germanics only cared about themselves, the English empire was much more racist than the Spanish and French empires, when the Anglo-Saxons settled in the British islands they did not want to mix with the Celts, the Germans for a time were xenophobic against the Slavs, white Americans have been openly more racist than white Latin Americans (except for a few)

The only Germanic group that perhaps breaks this rule are the Vikings who had no problem mixing with other ethnic groups.

[Ruggery]

Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, Suebis, Saxons and Franks were not at all.

The Visigoths at first yes, in fact the reason why they had to mix with the Iberians was because if they followed their model they would become extinct.
The Saxons also initially isolated themselves.

[Incal]

Today Germanics are least racist, but it is artificial in their character.

Agreed. It's trough indoctrination, that's why it's almost impossible to find a moderate in the US: It's either #blacklivesmatter LBGQTXYZ #nobodyisforeigneronstolenland OR fucking ni66ers! bitches should be slaves! kill everybody!

[Creoda]

Historically yes. You can see that in behaviour of Germanic tribes, they separated themselves from conquered natives who were in other "caste" that didn't mix with them.
Slavs were nothing like that but freed and mixed with their slaves.

Well most of the Germanic speaking world is heavily mixed with Celtic peoples and/or Slavs, so I'm not sure about that. The Margaryan paper showed that the Vikings mixed with foreigners a hell of a lot too, it wasn't just multiculti propaganda.

[rothaer]

Well most of the Germanic speaking world is heavily mixed with Celtic peoples and/or Slavs, so I'm not sure about that. The Margaryan paper showed that the Vikings mixed with foreigners a hell of a lot too, it wasn't just multiculti propaganda.

Maybe Scandinavians, that never really cared, should be exempted.

Btw. by the public and also by „MyTrueAncesry“ a lot of arbitrary „Viking Age“ individuals got labelled „Viking“. And a lot of foreign Sigtuna merchants from after the Viking Age (ending 1066) were labelled „Viking Age“ and even „Viking“, which then made a pretty wrong impression in the public about Vikings.

[Cristiano viejo]

The Visigoths at first yes, in fact the reason why they had to mix with the Iberians was because if they followed their model they would become extinct.
The Saxons also initially isolated themselves.

The reason why Visigoths mixed with Celtiberians was solely and exclusively because they became Catholic.

[TheMaestro]

Nope