6
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,045 Given: 990 |
Kiel's LM Genetics K36 Ancestral report
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,425 Given: 6,764 |
Okay, you have not a very high similarity anywhere, because you are not fully from one particular region and these that you are from are somewhat disparate. On the other hand you are clearly most similar to Burgenland. This is pretty good as a summary, I think! And not too far away from where you actually are... Also, the wide region of the next darkest colour seems plausible imo.
A nice result!
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,045 Given: 990 |
I do like these resultsOriginally Posted by rothaer
Okay, you have not a very high similarity anywhere, because you are not fully from one particular region and these that you are from are somewhat disparate. On the other hand you are clearly most similar to Burgenland. This is pretty good as a summary, I think! And not too far away from where you actually are... Also, the wide region of the next darkest colour seems plausible imo.
A nice result!
Im pretty sure I have no ancestors coming from Burgenland tho. First I thought Burgenland Austrians would be close to Hungarians from Transdanubia but according to this (and k13 also) Austrians from Burgenland are closer to southern Germans than Hungarians from transdanubia. Its Kamten, Salzburg and Steiermark that are closer to Hungarians. Im quite surprised by this to be honest.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,045 Given: 990 |
Its quite weird but all my 16 great-grandparents were born in a 30km radius.Okay, you have not a very high similarity anywhere, because you are not fully from one particular region and these that you are from are somewhat disparate. On the other hand you are clearly most similar to Burgenland. This is pretty good as a summary, I think! And not too far away from where you actually are... Also, the wide region of the next darkest colour seems plausible imo.
A nice result!
These are the closest regions after Burgenland + that area they were born.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,425 Given: 6,764 |
While most of Austria is tribally Bavarian (Vorarlberg is tribally Alemannian) Burgenland is said to have been initially (means as for Germans) settled by tribal Franks or Franconians. Since these days there may have been a lot of changes, but I can imagine that this initial Franconian stock in some way may be visible.I do like these results
Im pretty sure I have no ancestors coming from Burgenland tho. First I thought Burgenland Austrians would be close to Hungarians from Transdanubia but according to this (and k13 also) Austrians from Burgenland are closer to southern Germans than Hungarians from transdanubia. Its Kamten, Salzburg and Steiermark that are closer to Hungarians. Im quite surprised by this to be honest.
However, preliminary conclusion: Genetically you are a pseudo Burgenlander.
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,045 Given: 990 |
Hmm, interesting stuff. I dont know much about this part of German history to be honest.While most of Austria is tribally Bavarian (Vorarlberg is tribally Alemannian) Burgenland is said to have been initially (means as for Germans) settled by tribal Franks or Franconians. Since these days there may have been a lot of changes, but I can imagine that this initial Franconian stock in some way may be visible.
However, preliminary conclusion: Genetically you are a pseudo Burgenlander.
Theres so many Hungarian people living in Burgenland these days, its crazy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks