Out of Africa is false obviously

[Miko]

In the USA academia there's an unbelievable afrocentrism. You'd think that this is only in the progressive political and social sciences.
But I came to the conclussion it's also a thing of other fields, such as biology.

It's the only way to explain the constant repetition of the ''''''fact'''''' that we come from africa, that the origins of the Human Species are in Africa, the "our ancestors from Africa" of some DNA testing company(🤣🤣🤣&#129315.


If you came from another country, for example in Europe, you'd think that such allegation is based on science, but once you're familiar with American culture, it becomes pretty obvious that there are motivations behind that enormous hype towards a race that btw doesn't have much in common with us(music, ads, politics, history, political narrative...)


First, that Human migration from Africa isn't based on ANY fossil, not a single one.
It's based on mtDNA and Y-Chromosome philogenies, that put them THE FURTHEST AWAY FROM EVERY OTHER RACE!!!! That isn't precisely the best proof of them being our ancestors, they interpret that as saying they are the oldest and we descend from them.
Even though... It says they're the most unrelated!!!😂😂😎😎🤦🤦

In fact, the paper Klysov et al 2012 prooved that A and B Y-haplogroups aren't the fathers of the other haplogroups, rather a (distant) uncle. The genetic markers that define A and B aren't present in any other haplogroup.

If we're talking about 'haplogroup L', there's neither need to say they gave birth to mitochondrial haplogroup N(ancestor of R). L could just have migrated into africa from Eurasia, becaue it's in Eurasia where we find the oldest tools that give testimony of civilization.
It's very obvious that bantoids and caucasoids(and mongoloids, australoids...) Have evolved separately.
They don't share a lot of costumes as well as physical features.


But the biggest nail in the coffin is UST-ISHIM, the first modern Human Sapiens in Eurasia. Found in Siberia(it's always in Siberia) 45,000 years ago.
It's said to have completed 70% of the genetic differentiation that africans have with Europeans today.
I repeat, ONLY SOME THOUSAND YEARS after the alleged "out of Africa" migration we ALREADY see a CRO-MAGNON!!!!!!!!!

How on Earth evolution happens so fast???? Unless... The ancestor of Ust-Ishim always lived in the Russian/Siberian steppe

[Rostos vilmoskörte]

Of course its fake, doesn't stop them from trying so hard on social media to try to steal other races history.

[Beowulf]

one day in Facebook there was a Afro American who considered himself a "Prince" he claims that he and the western african tribes are the true Israelites, that they are the original hebrews he says that his slave ancestors were brought to America becuase God choosed that, and well there is a lot of facebook groups like this that mix religion with genetic and everything is a chaos there is only Supremacists and nationalists not only Africans also Turks,Europeans etc...

[tk'es]

if it's fake then y-dna (i1, i2, j1, j2, q, r1a, r1b etc) haplogroup scientific projects are baseless?

[Jingle Bell]

one day in Facebook there was a Afro American who considered himself a "Prince" he claims that he and the western african tribes are the true Israelites, that they are the original hebrews he says that his slave ancestors were brought to America becuase God choosed that, and well there is a lot of facebook groups like this that mix religion with genetic and everything is a chaos there is only Supremacists and nationalists not only Africans also Turks,Europeans etc...

lmao, i alr saw guys saying the true Europeans and ME's were Black ssa

Looks at this bruh: http://realhistoryww.com

[Beowulf]

lmao, i alr saw guys saying the true Europeans and ME's were Black ssa

Looks at this bruh: http://realhistoryww.com

Man, i really hate PSEUDO HISTORY

[Jingle Bell]

Man, i really hate PSEUDO HISTORY

The worst part its he dont show ANY prove, he just say dark skin = SSA, so Cro-Magnons are nigerians, Aemrindians too, and S. Euros are mulattos bruh

[Beowulf]

The worst part its he dont show ANY prove, he just say dark skin = SSA, so Cro-Magnons are nigerians, Aemrindians too, and S. Euros are mulattos bruh

yeah i know they always do that i've seen afro americans caliming that Natufians were SSA and posted a photo of a statue of a SSA from Egypt not a Natufian, or aturk that claimed that indo europeans were haplo J and that we aueropeans are Turks Becuase we have haplo R bruh, also claim the presence of turks in west europe because there are towns that have the name Turk or Turque in their names, others that Saxons were hebrews becuase some saxons had Haplo E-V13 (older than Judaism) it diesn't make sense anything

[Marshall Theodore]

I never gave much credit to this theory, it always seemed very absurd to me, especially when I became interested in anthropology.

[Roy]

In the USA academia there's an unbelievable afrocentrism. You'd think that this is only in the progressive political and social sciences.
But I came to the conclussion it's also a thing of other fields, such as biology.

It's the only way to explain the constant repetition of the ''''''fact'''''' that we come from africa, that the origins of the Human Species are in Africa, the "our ancestors from Africa" of some DNA testing company(��������).


If you came from another country, for example in Europe, you'd think that such allegation is based on science, but once you're familiar with American culture, it becomes pretty obvious that there are motivations behind that enormous hype towards a race that btw doesn't have much in common with us(music, ads, politics, history, political narrative...)


First, that Human migration from Africa isn't based on ANY fossil, not a single one.
It's based on mtDNA and Y-Chromosome philogenies, that put them THE FURTHEST AWAY FROM EVERY OTHER RACE!!!! That isn't precisely the best proof of them being our ancestors, they interpret that as saying they are the oldest and we descend from them.
Even though... It says they're the most unrelated!!!������������

In fact, the paper Klysov et al 2012 prooved that A and B Y-haplogroups aren't the fathers of the other haplogroups, rather a (distant) uncle. The genetic markers that define A and B aren't present in any other haplogroup.

If we're talking about 'haplogroup L', there's neither need to say they gave birth to mitochondrial haplogroup N(ancestor of R). L could just have migrated into africa from Eurasia, becaue it's in Eurasia where we find the oldest tools that give testimony of civilization.
It's very obvious that bantoids and caucasoids(and mongoloids, australoids...) Have evolved separately.
They don't share a lot of costumes as well as physical features.


But the biggest nail in the coffin is UST-ISHIM, the first modern Human Sapiens in Eurasia. Found in Siberia(it's always in Siberia) 45,000 years ago.
It's said to have completed 70% of the genetic differentiation that africans have with Europeans today.
I repeat, ONLY SOME THOUSAND YEARS after the alleged "out of Africa" migration we ALREADY see a CRO-MAGNON!!!!!!!!!

How on Earth evolution happens so fast???? Unless... The ancestor of Ust-Ishim always lived in the Russian/Siberian steppe

A lot of things now are woke but Out of Africa theory is not a result of that.