0
During the 19th century and early 20th century the capital of the Ottoman Empire was still a multi-ethnic city and at least half of the population was Christian, with much of it Greek, Armenian and "Levantine" Catholics( Ottoman subjects or residents of West European descent).
During this same period it became possible for Russia and to a lesser extent for Greece to take Constantinople from the Turk, but when an opportunity arose like before the Crimean War(1853-1856) or during the Russo-Romanian-Turkish war of 1877-1878, Britain and France opposed it. Most opposed to Russia or even Greece taking Constantinople and the straits was Britain and later Germany too. At the beginning of ww1 Britain and France signed a secret treaty with Russia, giving her Constantinople and the straits. Well, as we know, the Russian revolution made the implementation of this secret treaty impossible and after the war Greece claimed the city, but Britain and France again opposed it and it didn't happen.
Why didn't they want Greece to have the city? I mean with Russia it was supposedly that Russians would become strong and dangerous in the Mediterranean and this threatened Britain and France's possessions and interests there, but they accepted even Russian claims in the end. Why not accept Greek claims since Greece could never threaten the western powers even as much as Turkey could?
Bookmarks