Why Russians are warmongers?Deep analysis.

[Loki]

Everyone thinks that about their religion though. But it's more prominent in Abrahamic faiths. Eastern stuff is less into universal truth and less judgemental.

It doesn't matter what "everyone" thinks. Fact of the matter is that only one can be the truth, and all others deception. And Jesus is the truth.

[Jana]

It doesn't matter what "everyone" thinks. Fact of the matter is that only one can be the truth, and all others deception. And Jesus is the truth.

[KirillMazur]

It's strange random statement out of topic context, started by a Chinese explaining Russian expansionism in a bizarre way.

He is not Chinese, but most likely Taiwanese.
In a simplified form, his "deep analysis" coincides with the opinion of this Ukrainian blogger (during the Maidan, by the way, he covered the events on the square from prominent anti-Maidan positions).
https://ermalex76.livejournal.com/996541.html

“The Russian army is the most terrible army in the world. This is not propaganda or exaggeration. If you don't believe me, look at the world map. Do you really think that more than 100 nations voluntarily became part of Russia?
If you believe it, it's very bad. Because the truth is that only a wild and merciless horde can conquer such territory. Russia conquered such territory, committing the most terrible war crimes and genocide against peoples."

Here is a statement on the same issue by a representative of the Western elite, an English statesman, Viceroy of India, British Foreign Secretary in 1919-1925, George Curzon (1859-1925) after visiting the Asian part of Russia (translated from Russian):

“Russia undeniably has a remarkable gift for seeking loyalty and even friendship with those whom it has subjugated by force. The Russian is fraternizing in the full sense of the word. He is completely free from that deliberate type of superiority and grim arrogance which inflames malice more than cruelty itself. He does not shy away from social and familial contact with alien and inferior races. His invincible nonchalance makes it easy for him to take a non-interference attitude in other people's affairs; and the tolerance with which he regards the religious rites, social customs, and local prejudices of his Asiatic brethren, is less the result of diplomatic calculation than the fruit of innate carelessness. A remarkable feature of Russification carried out in Central Asia is the use that the conqueror finds for his former opponents on the battlefield. I remember the ceremony of welcoming the Tsar in Baku, which was attended by four khans from Merv in Russian military uniforms. This is just a casual illustration of Russia's consistent line, which is itself an offshoot of General Skobelev's "hugs and kisses after a good beating" theory. The khans were sent to Petersburg to impress and delight them, and to cover them with orders and medals to satisfy their vanity. Upon their return, they were restored to their previous positions, even expanding their old powers. The British have never been able to use their recent enemies in such a way."

Because the Russians have never looked at any people as "an alien and inferior race." Unlike representatives of the enlightened Europe. Yes, and Russian carelessness is not carelessness, but ordinary humanism.
In any case, the whole history of Russia is the history of various peoples winding up on the imperial center - from Muroma and Meshchora to Moldovans and Tajiks.
And everyone knew perfectly well where the conditional borders would lie and how not to cross them, both the imperial administration and the locals had a rough idea of what awaited them (how delighted the Tashkent merchants were when they turned out to be Russian subjects - the tsarist officials were holy people against the background of the khans' ones). Because the change of cruelty to cruel laws is, by definition, better.

It was also because the Russians viewed the annexed territories not as colonies, but as part of a unified Russia. General Kaufman wrote about Turkestan: "Here is Russian land in which it's not shameful for Russian bones to lie." Accordingly, the people inhabiting these territories became part of the Russian people. It was all the easier because Christianity and Islam coexisted in Russia since ancient times, and since the time of the mass importation of Germans, Orthodoxy with Lutheranism and other European trends, too.
In short, fear and hatred come from an alternative (already then, under the tsars!) project for the annexation of peoples.
The West cannot annex nations in an alternative way. Just as a homosexual cannot behave like a straight man, so the British cannot behave towards other races as the Russians do. They have superiority in their blood, with mother's milk. Order in the colonies was always based on bayonets and intrigues.

[Bydlo]

Indo-European heritage