Originally Posted by
Dragoon
In the same week that the European Parliament voted in favor of a resolution labeling the Great Replacement theory as “racist,” the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia reported that the United Nations, the Wittgenstein Center in Austria, and the Center for Global Development in Washington D.C. are all advocating that Europe needs at least 60 million migrants in the coming decades “to survive” and that most of this immigration should come from Africa.
The UN, which has long advocated for “replacement migration” as a solution to Europe’s aging population, is now warning that Europe will not gain these migrants “if it does not stop being a fortress against immigration,” according to the Spanish paper.
The UN estimates that in 2050, the EU will have a shortage of 60.8 million workers, and the Wittgenstein Center for Demography and Global Human Capital argues this shortage will be even higher, placing it at 72.7 million. Both organizations are using their own estimates to advocate for further mass immigration.
https://rmx.news/european-union/repl...ng-eu-by-2050/
The author of the United Nations Charter, Leon Pasvolsky, was Jewish, and the Charter itself was a word-for-word copy of the Soviet constitution (Marshalko (1958): 229). Although the UN "sponsored" the anti-communist Korean war, the commander of the UN forces, Gen Douglas MacArthur, was constrained from taking the necessary measures to win the war (Stormer (1964): 205) -- he was forbidden, for example, from bombing the bridges between China and North Korea over which the Korean army was being supplied -- and in addition, all his strategic decisions were known in advance by the North Koreans because this information was passed on to the communists by the UN Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs, Constantin Zinchinko or Zinkovich -- a Jew and communist appointee -- who was MacArthur's superior (Marshalko (1958), ibid). (The no-win Korean war was an eerie precursor of another war fought against the communists only a few years later in Vietnam, and brought to a similar no-win conclusion under a Jewish Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger.) In the present day, the UN has provided leftist nations with a propaganda podium for bashing the US and subverting democratic ideals. It has conferred respectability to a host of radical leftist nonsense, including world government (ie, world dictatorship), environmental radicalism (and the totalitarian measures necessary to implement it), world gun control, world press censorship, world taxation, and the stamping out of national cultures and differences, particularly such dangerous phenomena as the American Constitution and the ideas of individual freedom and limited government which it embodies.
Marshalko, Louis, The World Conquerers, The Real War Criminals, Christian Book Club, 1958 (repr 1983)
Stormer, John A, None Dare Call It Treason, Liberty Bell Press, 1964
The Wittgenstein children [including Ludwig] were brought up as Christians, but they counted as full Jews under the Nuremberg racial laws because three of their grandparents had been born Jewish and did not convert to Christianity until they reached adulthood.
"The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women he strives to break down the last barriers of discrimination between him and other peoples. The Jews were responsible for bringing negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate. For as long as a people remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of their blood, they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardized people" --Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf: Chapter XI: Race and People
We all know that there are those who have been given ample information about the Jewish Question and yet refuse to see Jews as a threat to America, the West, or the white race. It is thus reasonable to inquire as to what blocks such persons' ability to see what many of us consider to be little short of obvious. In reflecting on the matter, my conclusion is that there are two factors responsible for this blocking.
The first factor is the reluctance to draw an inductive conclusion from the facts -- something which might be described as acknowledging the existence of all the dots, but without a willingness to connect them into the Big Picture which the rest of us see. This of course is not irrational, since it is not a logical conclusion that is to be (or not to be) drawn, but rather an inductive one. It is similar to the situation in which x happens, and then y happens immediately after: How many times does the sequence {x, y} have to occur before one concludes that x causes y? Some will draw the conclusion of causation more quickly than others, but no one -- including those who fail to draw the conclusion at all -- can properly be said to be 'wrong'.
The second factor blocking the conclusion that Jews are a threat is the refusal to make generalizations about Jews, in favor of attributing every instance of bad Jewish behavior merely to certain individual Jews. For example, rather than saying that the Russian Revolution was Jewish, one might argue that it was carried out by people who just happened to BE Jewish; and one could argue likewise for every other event or situation cited as evidence of the Jewish undermining of Western or American civilization, or the white race.
Ultimately, then, the position which one takes on the Jewish Question is a matter of belief. We can build a mountain of evidence, but whether a person finds it compelling depends solely on the particular person who sees it. And exactly what that person believes has much to do with the success of the mass media in painting the Jews as 'good guys' and 'victims', and smearing their opponents as 'evil racists' and 'haters'.
But if this is disappointing, we may nonetheless be happy that there are other factors which act to open people's minds. These include the many lies and exaggerations which Jews have been responsible for, particularly regarding the Holocaust. They also include the fact that the Jews and their friends refuse to debate with those who set forth seemingly-rational arguments. They include the taboo which surrounds the criticism of Jews -- something which reveals the power and willingness of Jews and their shabby goy factotems to do harm to people who dare to criticize the Self-Chosen. And they certainly include the many laws which have been passed against 'Holocaust denial' and 'antisemitism', which force people to recognize both the considerable power of Organized Jewry and the fact that Jews fear the truth and thus wish to hush it up.
Proverbial wisdom tells us that the truth will out; and when it does, a lot of people may just be angry enough to insure that there will be some real gas chambers this time
‘Replacement migration’ – UN and think tanks promote 60 million migrants for ‘aging’ EU by 2050
Reply With Quote
България
Bookmarks