0
1. Those are examples of mixed Jewish/gentiles and of European Jewish extraction, their DNA is predominantly European. I was referring to the lighter examples of the populations that genetically fall clearly out of the European clusters, but you always like to complicate with statistically irrelevant examples.
2. Don't argue with me, go argue with the anthropologists who created the definitions of what is light and dark pigmentation wise. Brown hair and medium/mixed eyes are not light according to their definitions and therefore the large majority of Europeans don't have light hair and light eyes.
3. I wrote the "majority or most" I didn't wrote that there isn't a minority that is passable. Funny that you are so much into details and rethoric subtleties regarding some things and suddenly decide to ignore certain key words in a sentence in order to attempt to subvert its meaning. That makes you by definition a sophist , but that's no secret to the whole forum.
4. Wrong again, it's amazing the amount of nonsensical rubbish you can come up with in a day:
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/...est-cover.html
Continents By Forest Cover
Despite being the sixth largest continent with an area of 10,180,000 sq km, Europe has the largest forest cover among the continents of the world. The forest cover of Europe is 1,015 million hectares, as of 2015. Thus, the continent has a forest cover of 1.42 hectares per capita. The Russian Federation accounts for 81% of the continent’s forest area. The forest area of the continent has exhibited a steady rise of 0.08% annually. Over two-thirds of Europe’s forest cover is, however, semi-natural. Northern and eastern Europe has larger areas of virgin forest cover than the western parts of the continent.
https://www.statista.com/chart/20500...-environments/In 2019, Yale University released their Environmental Performance Index (EPI) for all 180 countries in order to gauge which countries had the highest environmental quality and which had the lowest. The EPI measures two dimensions, environmental health and ecosystem vitality, through numerous metrics that focus on biodiversity, air and water quality, climate and agriculture. European and North American countries held the highest overall scores, while Asian and African countries saw the lowest, globally.
In 2019, Yale University released their Environmental Performance Index (EPI) for all 180 countries in order to gauge which countries had the highest environmental quality and which had the lowest. The EPI measures two dimensions, environmental health and ecosystem vitality, through numerous metrics that focus on biodiversity, air and water quality, climate and agriculture.
5. Already talked about Jewish genetics and if you're honest you will admit that Jews outside of Europe and North America haven't produced anything significant, they benefited from the social and educational context achieved in those territories.
Irrelevant about the supposedly higher IQ of NE Asians, they haven't achieved a fraction of what Europeans did despite being even more numerous. Beside, again your hypocritical double standards, you mention that not all European countries have the same weight on achievements ( and that is factual since the scientific and literary production is tied to the main educational centers, that is the norm in every country and every continent) but you are not divisive and don't miss a chance to generalize about Jews and NE Asians, like they are monolithic entities, that suits you fine.
Nevertheless, it is factual that the vast majority (if not all) European countries are over achievers in comparative terms despite the internal, continental, assimetries.
Bookmarks