0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,320 Given: 1,211 |
Yes, however Alot of them converted to Islam during the 1970s etc. So now they have second or even third generation born ethnic English Muslims, and they are not mixed, they are literally full blooded pure english muslims. I had stumbled on one of community members profile some time ago on Facebook and was fascinated lol then couple years later I found out that they have a whole community / masjid that is majority English . For me that's interesting .
This was also confirmed here
https://www.tiktok.com/@harryround11...87566095748379
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,320 Given: 1,211 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,320 Given: 1,211 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,666 Given: 5,623 |
Well, put those non european light skinned caucasians in subsaharian Africa or even India, most of Asia etc, and the locals would see them as white, that's for sure.
One thing is being european (or of european descent), another thing is to be considered white, whatever the subjective definition one might choose. Some people even go to the point of excluding non-christians from their definition of white, which is nonsensincal, aren't Bosnians white and european despite most of them being muslims? Likewise some ethnicities tecognized as autochtonous europeans are not white/not fully white, such as the Sammi and many more that live especially in Russia. Those people are no less european than everybody else, no one has the right to claim that. Indeed there is a lot of stupidity and childdish emotionalism regardingt those concepts.
Southern Brazil is quite industrialized and if it was a country separated from the rest it would rank among the developed nations. Argentina had horrible governments for many decades but it has a decent infrastructure and one can see it was indeed a developed country.
The moral and cultural colonialism supported by angry leftist activists with their ideological allucinations that they know better than everyone else, who are nothing but useful idiots for the economic neocolonialists. There you have it, the full circle.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
I suppose so.
I agree, though I remember even you said you consider Georgians to be 'whiter' than Albanians due to religion.One thing is being european (or of european descent), another thing is to be considered white, whatever the subjective definition one might choose. Some people even go to the point of excluding non-christians from their definition of white, which is nonsensincal, aren't Bosnians white and european despite most of them being muslims? Likewise some ethnicities tecognized as autochtonous europeans are not white/not fully white, such as the Sammi and many more that live especially in Russia. Those people are no less european than everybody else, no one has the right to claim that. Indeed there is a lot of stupidity and childdish emotionalism regardingt those concepts.
According to the UNHDI, even Southern Brazil is only really comparable to the likes of Panama, Barbados and North Macedonia. Developed, but at the 'lower' end of the spectrum. https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...are-comparableSouthern Brazil is quite industrialized and if it was a country separated from the rest it would rank among the developed nations. Argentina had horrible governments for many decades but it has a decent infrastructure and one can see it was indeed a developed country.
The strange irony about many people on both the Left and the more liberal-minded Right is that they support diversity (in a very limited epistemological sense) within nations while opposing genuine diversity between them. They want everyone to live and speak according to the holy gospel of Amnesty International and California, whatever their wishes.The moral and cultural colonialism supported by angry leftist activists with their ideological allucinations that they know better than everyone else, who are nothing but useful idiots for the economic neocolonialists. There you have it, the full circle.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,189 Given: 3 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,189 Given: 3 |
Anthropologia Suecica says that 52% of Swedes were ashen blonds and 23% golden blonds. There you have the two classes of blondness represented within the Swedish folk! I think it depends on the scale used. Regardless, here it shows that at least 75% were fair-haired.
In my other source, the South Norwegian Agder region had recorded more than 80% blond for adult males (the blondest place in the world), this place ties Central Estonia.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks