Critical Thoughts on White Nationalism?

[Mortimer]

I talk about White Nationalism and critice them. What is your opinion. Did I made any good argument?

[GreentheViper]

Based

[Mortimer]

Based

An austrian man saw my video his response was that im racist to all non gypsies what do you think of that childish response?

[GreentheViper]

An austrian man saw my video his response was that im racist to all non gypsies what do you think of that childish response?

It’s blasphemy

[Cristiano viejo]

Go back to India, help to erradicate the white nationalism, Morti.

[SouthDutch7991]

Should be contained within ethno-nationalism, a little redundant and many wings of it are batshit insane. Realistically you should want your countrys stock to be of the same pool as you, because that's what makes a genetic group or nation, not citizenship. I think focusing on "white" rather than the underlying ethnicity will, ironically, end up undermining proper ethno-nationalism in white countries. You know if you are English, Spanish, German, Russian, or in my case an Anglo-American. Detaching myself from my ethnic background of European, English-speaking, English and German derived culture, religion, and genetic stock, will eventually destroy the group that really mattered to me and even allow people who hate my ethnic group to try and be a part of my "nationalism".

Being a white nationalist if you're a nationalist in any European ethnic group should go without saying. Civic nationalism is not real. America only worked in the past because it was overwhelmingly British-Isles-derived WASP.

[Mortimer]

Realistically you should want your countrys stock to be of the same pool as you, because that's what makes a genetic group or nation, not citizenship.

Not sure. Im split on that, I do understand your point though, I understand what you mean and think you do have a valid point. Like a ethnic-genetic group is like a family, there is more cohesion maybe less conflict etc... I mean I do see the bigger picture.... the principle but then when you apply it to concrete situations it seems injust or unfair... and there will always be someone oppressing the other seperate but equal doesnt really work, someone is always stronger and has the upper hand, in segregation....

I read this on Stormfront...

I remember when I lived in Mississippi in the 80's, there was a bar down there like the one in the movie "Urban Cowboy". There was even a mechanical bull in there. Strictly Whites went in there.
Until one night, 2 black couples walked in. They didn't stay long. I don't even think they bought a drink. They turned their black posteriors around, and left in a hurry! They knew better.
Not like that now is it?


https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1378878/

What do you think of this concrete situation? Do you think it is ok for that place to disallow blacks? What would you do in such a concrete situation?

[Marshall Theodore]

Ok.

[SouthDutch7991]

Not sure. Im split on that, I do understand your point though, I understand what you mean and think you do have a valid point. Like a ethnic-genetic group is like a family, there is more cohesion maybe less conflict etc... I mean I do see the bigger picture.... the principle but then when you apply it to concrete situations it seems injust or unfair... and there will always be someone oppressing the other seperate but equal doesnt really work, someone is always stronger and has the upper hand, in segregation....

I read this on Stormfront...

I remember when I lived in Mississippi in the 80's, there was a bar down there like the one in the movie "Urban Cowboy". There was even a mechanical bull in there. Strictly Whites went in there.
Until one night, 2 black couples walked in. They didn't stay long. I don't even think they bought a drink. They turned their black posteriors around, and left in a hurry! They knew better.
Not like that now is it?


https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1378878/

What do you think of this concrete situation? Do you think it is ok for that place to disallow blacks? What would you do in such a concrete situation?

Yeah absolutely. Is it fair if those blacks were decent people who just wanted to go to thee bar? No not realty but determining national policy isn't about what is nice or is "fair" in the child-like sense of fairness. I do believe in fairness and just rule of law but that can't always happen. In this case, blacks had to be segregated as a rule to maintain the existing White American society. It's unfortunate for that couple, and I do feel bad for them, but even if I felt bad for them I would make the same decision. I would act the same way.

[Mortimer]

Yeah absolutely. Is it fair if those blacks were decent people who just wanted to go to thee bar? No not realty but determining national policy isn't about what is nice or is "fair" in the child-like sense of fairness. I do believe in fairness and just rule of law but that can't always happen. In this case, blacks had to be segregated as a rule to maintain the existing White American society. It's unfortunate for that couple, and I do feel bad for them, but even if I felt bad for them I would make the same decision. I would act the same way.

You have to imagine if you were that black person, maybe you would not make the same decision anymore. I read a philosopher who said if someone passes laws he has to imagine that he is everyone, the man, the woman, the child, etc. as if he were everyone and then make the law. That seems like a moral philosophy though. I guess Im influenced because Im the black person, or the same status as the black person. Like a year ago I watched a movie in movie theatres, a movie based on a famous austrian cartoonist, it was about gypsies who came to a town in austria in the 1960s, and many were "nazis" first they didnt got a drink in a bar, they had to leave the bar, second some guys plotted to bomb and set on fire their camp. So Im the black guy (guy who doesnt get a drink) what if you were me? Would you still make the same decision?