Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Iran nuclear inspectors detect uranium enriched to 84% purity

  1. #1
    Veteran Member Annihilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:29 AM
    Location
    Lake TĎtĎcaca
    Ethnicity
    turkĎc
    Country
    Ukraine
    Gender
    Posts
    6,259
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,966
    Given: 3,715

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Iran nuclear inspectors detect uranium enriched to 84% purity

    International atomic monitors in Iran last week detected uranium enriched to levels just below that needed for a nuclear weapon, according to two senior diplomats, underscoring the risk that the country’s unrestrained atomic activities could prompt a new crisis.

    The International Atomic Energy Agency is trying to clarify how Iran accumulated uranium enriched to 84 percent purity—the highest level found by inspectors in the country to date, and a concentration just 6 percent below what’s needed for a weapon. Iran had previously told the IAEA that its centrifuges were configured to enrich uranium to a 60 percent level of purity.

    Inspectors need to determine whether Iran intentionally produced the material, or whether the concentration was an unintended accumulation within the network of pipes connecting the hundreds of fast-spinning centrifuges used to separate the isotopes. It’s the second time this month that monitors have detected suspicious enrichment-related activities.


    A senior Iranian nuclear official denied Iran had enriched uranium beyond 60 percent purity “so far” and dismissed the development as “a smear and a distortion of the facts.”

    “The existence of uranium particles above 60 percent does not mean the same thing as enrichment above 60 percent,” Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran told the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency.

    The IAEA responded on Sunday and said it is discussing with Iran the results of the agency’s recent verification activities and will inform its board of directors as appropriate, according to a tweet citing IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi.

    The development comes as Iran is increasingly isolated from the West and nuclear talks with world powers remain suspended. The country has also faced widespread condemnation for its deadly crackdown on major protests and the US and European Union have tightened sanctions on Iran over its military support for Russia’s war on Ukraine.

    Earlier on Sunday, Israel blamed Iran for a February 10 attack on an oil tanker in the Arabian Sea. The incident came about a fortnight after a drone strike on a weapons depot near Iran’s city of Isfahan that Tehran blamed on Israel.

    The IAEA is preparing its quarterly Iran safeguards report ahead of a March 6 Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, where the Persian Gulf nation’s nuclear work will figure prominently on the agenda.

    Iran hasn’t submitted required forms declaring its intention to raise uranium enrichment levels at two facilities near the towns of Natanz and Fordow, according to one diplomat.

    Even if the detected material was mistakenly accumulated because of technical difficulties in operating the centrifuge cascades—something that has happened before—it underscores the danger of Iran’s decision to produce highly enriched uranium, the other diplomat said.

    The IAEA has repeatedly said levels even at just 60 percent are technically indistinguishable from the level needed for a nuclear weapon. Most nuclear power reactors use material enriched to 5 percent purity.

    A nuclear deal between Iran and world powers unraveled after then-President Donald Trump withdrew the US in 2018 and reimposed sanctions. In response, Iranian officials expanded the country’s nuclear program. Tehran denies it’s seeking to build atomic warheads but concerns it might develop the technology to do so propelled years of diplomacy that led to the deal with world powers.

    Grossi called the atomic deal an “empty shell” last month and said Iran has sufficient nuclear material for several weapons, should it make the political decision to move forward.


    https://businessmirror.com.ph/2023/0...-to-84-purity/

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Last Online
    03-12-2024 @ 11:40 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Dongyi
    Ethnicity
    Han
    Ancestry
    Dongyi
    Country
    China
    Y-DNA
    O2a1c2*
    mtDNA
    D4
    Religion
    Taoism
    Gender
    Posts
    303
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 119
    Given: 6

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    OK then,We don't have to import them from Australia anymore,could stack few thousands more nukes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-02-2017, 01:57 PM
  2. Should Iran have the right to nuclear power?
    By Pontios in forum Politics & Ideology
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 02-02-2013, 01:48 PM
  3. Who Is Killing Iran's Nuclear Scientists?
    By European blood in forum Politics & Ideology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 06:18 PM
  4. Iran could produce a nuclear weapon within two months
    By Mercury in forum War & Military
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-08-2011, 11:18 PM
  5. EU to Iran: “Touring nuclear sites is not our job”
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum News Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-09-2011, 02:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •