Great replacement conspiracy: Protesters call for far-right debate at KU Leuven to be scrapped

[PHDNM]

Great replacement conspiracy: Protesters call for far-right debate at KU Leuven to be scrapped

13 march 2023

A group of academics, students, civil society organisations and residents of the city of Leuven is protesting a debate that will take place featuring Filip Dewinter of the Flemish far-right Vlaams Belang party. The topic is whether migration is an opportunity or represents a "great replacement" – a well-known far-right conspiracy theory.

Given Dewinter's political history, the event – scheduled to take place in a KU Leuven auditorium on Monday 13 March – is set to feature a number of divisive far-right tropes. Dewinter is due to debate with Maurits Vande Reyde of the Flemish liberal Open VLD party. But in an open letter, protesters argue that Dewinter's promotion of the great replacement conspiracy theory is "dangerous and racist."

https://www.brusselstimes.com/402593...to-be-scrapped

[Smeagol]

It's not a theory. It's in fact happening, and libtards gleefully point that out before denying it the next moment when they brag about how whites will in a few decades be a minority in our own countries.

[alnortedelsur]

It's not a theory. It's in fact happening, and libtards gleefully point that out before denying it the next moment when they brag about how whites will in a few decades be a minority in our own countries.

Their cynicism has not limits.

[Mortimer]

It is obviously not a conspiracy. It is happening or happened already in parts.

[Mortimer]

[Universe]

It's not a theory. It's in fact happening, and libtards gleefully point that out before denying it the next moment when they brag about how whites will in a few decades be a minority in our own countries.

I think it's seen as a conspiracy theory because the people who talk about ethnic replacement often attribute this phenomenon to a supposed "anti-white, Jewish elite" who control western countries from the background.

The reality is that White people have only themselves to blame for this not some outside factor (like Jewish activities). Western people willingly chose childlessness and individualism/hedonism/modernism over collectivism/traditionalism and the politicians who do the ethnic replacement policies (eg supporting immigration) are continuously elected by Western people in every western country at every election.

If Whites get replaced by non-Whites then Whites deserve it (as much as it hurts to say this), Whites chose this path.

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

The ratio of retirees to workers is unsustainable. If you're not going to have children (and the trend is with the higher standard of living of a nation the less likely you are to have a large family unless you're highly religious. We see the trend happening also in quickly developing nations) then you need to bring people from the outside.

Even Japan, which intellectually lazy and ignorant people bring up as an example of a modern nation that is homogeneous despite having the same demographic problem, is forced to change its immigration policy.

And cutting taxes so people will have more children doesn't work because, as I said, the trend for nations with a high living standard is to have less children even when they have more money in their bank account. People prefer to invest in the future of one or two children than have four and spread out those resources.

This is not a conspiracy of the 'elites.' It's a desperate attempt to avoid economic collapse.

[rajputprincess]

kids have nothing to do with money it is about culture.
Israel is developed country with very good fertility rate. If you talked to Israeli they talk about how child friendly Israel is. Parents grandparents help you with kids having more kids is seen as something amazing.

In most Asian countries of course parents and grandparents help with kid's. but educated people want best kid's. Smartest kid so trend is to have one kid and invest everything on him/her.giving best education is very expensive.
in my country educated people feel same like that their is also preference for male child but most people don't have more than one kid if first kid is a boy. This preference for boy is decreasing here so i am seeing more only daughters now. as for poor people they care less about education so they have more kid's than educated one. But they're also having less kid's now since fertility is decreasing

In Europe culture is individualistic. This culture encourage more independence and it automatically result in more childless.


It is not about development it is about culture

Sent from my Redmi Y3 using Tapatalk

[Petalpusher]

The ratio of retirees to workers is unsustainable. If you're not going to have children (and the trend is with the higher standard of living of a nation the less likely you are to have a large family unless you're highly religious. We see the trend happening also in quickly developing nations) then you need to brong people from the outside.

Even Japan, which intellectually lazy and ignorant people bring up as an example of a modern nation that is homogeneous despite having the same demographic problem, is forced to change its immigration policy.

And cutting taxes so people will have more children doesn't work because, as I said, the trend for nations with a high living standard is to have less children even when they have more money in their bank account. People prefer to invest in the future of one or two children than have four and spread out those resources.

This is not a conspiracy of the 'elites.' It's a desperate attempt to avoid economic collapse.

The problem is non European immigration costs more money than it brings more often than not. There are studies now official about this here, it's about 40 Billions a year in deficit in France. Such figures were floating around unofficially for a long time, yet denied or underestimated by all the "elites" for decades, rather called an enrichement instead. Denmark's budget ministry also released recently a 5 Billions cost figure, which was kept hidden by previous governements each years. They sure won't pay for the retirements as they are two or 3 times more unemployed than natives on the second or third generations after their parents came to work in a particular field, as well of course as every other "disadvantages" that comes as a bonus. When it's all said and done, the natives will pay for them, which they in fact already do. It just brings short term malleable workforce that constantly needs to be replaced to profit a few type of businesses, and keep the minimum wage low as it's the reserve army of unregulated capitalism.

A demographic decrease wouldn't be a bad thing anyway. Never ever i took the highway at 3pm in afternoon and thought "id really like more people, that would be awesome". Japan is rather investing heavily in robotics and automatization than entirely new immigration policies, but they are willing to take Chineses for example as a short term solution for specific skilled jobs, which is a sane solution. No nation should be engaged in that kind of silly race of natality in order to compete with newcomers. If it was really only an economic issue, European countries would simply favors or even restrict immigration from within Europe, it's obviously something else, albeit multi factorial, at work behind all that.

[Smeagol]

I think it's seen as a conspiracy theory because the people who talk about ethnic replacement often attribute this phenomenon to a supposed "anti-white, Jewish elite" who control western countries from the background.

The reality is that White people have only themselves to blame for this not some outside factor (like Jewish activities). Western people willingly chose childlessness and individualism/hedonism/modernism over collectivism/traditionalism and the politicians who do the ethnic replacement policies (eg supporting immigration) are continuously elected by Western people in every western country at every election.

If Whites get replaced by non-Whites then Whites deserve it (as much as it hurts to say this), Whites chose this path.

White people deserve some blame for giving Jews so much power in our societies in the first place, but Jews have been the main force working to replace us. In my country it was the Jews who were responsible for the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act that which brought us down from a 90% white nation to a 55% white nation (and decreasing) in 50 years.