2
That's why I mentioned the Einstein analogy. While his work did not come out of the blue, he was the person who actually played a pivotal role. Similarly, with Spain, while other nations may have had influences, it was Spain that took the initiative and made the greatest contributions to the establishment and expansion of their empire in Latin America.
De nada. After all, who needs tomatoes and potatoes? They certainly didn't revolutionize global cuisine or have any significant impact on agriculture, right?Not taking anything away from Spain, but is it really that magnificent that happened in Latin America. Well it created New World, gave us tomatoes and potatoes,but is it something that magical.
'Magical' may not be the word I would use, but it does highlight the remarkable resilience of the Russian people.Or is Russian Conquest of Siberia that magical?
Oh yeah? In what sense is Russia's wealth a curse? The Russian colonization of Siberia played a significant role in transforming Russia into a superpower, much like the case of the U.S. of A. In what way is that a curse?It gave Russia more land and resources but a country can get also cursed by it's wealth. I see the competition of great powers being epic, new technology and all shit but let's not forget about negative sides. That said Spain has also done very positive things. Colonization is a tricky and messy process.
Colonization does indeed bring a new technology and wealth. I agree with your last sentence, but frankly I don't care much.
Bookmarks