The Vendetta Against Atlantid

[lei.talk]

Colonel Frank Grimes You were given many opportunities
to post a physical anthropologist using the term Atlantid
and you've always been silent when asked...

Here is another opportunity for you to fail
at naming a physical anthropologist using the term Atlantid.

I understand that many people don’t known...

[Septentrion]

Agrippa invented the term Atlantid. Agrippa is an internet personality on these anthro forums.

You were given many opportunities to post a physical anthropologist using the term Atlantid and you've always been silent when asked.




This coming from a guy who disregards the definition of Caucasoid for his own made-up definition of the word. The moment you contradict the dictionary with your own definition of a word you prove yourself not to be a serious person.

Teach me what the definition of Caucaosoid is, Septentrion.... Educate me... lolz...

Here is another opportunity for you to fail at naming a physical anthropologist using the term Atlantid.

Oh please! Shut it. Who gave you the power to start giving opportunities to people? Who did?

[Septentrion]

Why are many people on these anthropology threads so ignorant? The Atlantid type is a Nordic-Mediterranean type in which the Nordic element is mainly the Keltic Nordid type. and the Mediterranean element from the Atlanto-Mediterranean type. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to know this.

[lei.talk]

...the same phenotype...

...Deniker called it Ibero Insular,
and Coon called it Small Mediterranean...

...and, yet they have different names

a steady tack-tack-tack persisted
as meine kleine über-mädchen used my old type-writer
to alter one of the phenotype-cards dangling off the mobile
hanging from our ceiling.



she was sitting on the floor
transcribing from two books open next to the type-writer.

then, she flipped one of the 5x8 cards over
and made changes on the front.

she handed to me a new card labelled Ibero-insular^Deniker
and flipped through the old red book
pointing to each of the somatic characteristics and the territorial range
copied on to the back of the file-card.

leaning over the sand-box in which we played geometry,

she traced a small circle
and dropped the new card on it.





next, she swepted through pages in the remaining book
pointing out the wider range of taxonomical metrics
and the far broader range of territory.

drew a larger circle in the sand
to hold the original file-card and said "Sub-set."

eleven-years-old.

[Odelia]

Phenotypes are bullshit, but they do exist to represent a look. Doesn't mean anything. It's just an outward appearance. You can be atlantid from Italy, Serbia and even Turkey and have nothing to do genetically with atlantic peoples. That all said, I do dislike the atlantid look in guys cos it's unattractive and very white american ughh! They approach the med look (which is hot) but fail at it. I know other girls dig the whole ''sexy atlantid dude'' look. Dark hair, blue eye combo do nothing for me.



Yeah, this ain't for me...

[Eurafricanid]

a steady tack-tack-tack persisted
as meine kleine über-mädchen used my old type-writer
to alter one of the phenotype-cards dangling off the mobile
hanging from our ceiling.



she was sitting on the floor
transcribing from two books open next to the type-writer.

then, she flipped one of the 5x8 cards over
and made changes on the front.

she handed to me a new card labelled Ibero-insular^Deniker
and flipped through the old red book
pointing to each of the somatic characteristics and the territorial range
copied on to the back of the file-card.

leaning over the sand-box in which we played geometry,

she traced a small circle
and dropped the new card on it.





next, she swepted through pages in the remaining book
pointing out the wider range of taxonomical metrics
and the far broader range of territory.

drew a larger circle in the sand
to hold the original file-card and said "Sub-set."

eleven-years-old.

I'm tired of this, already!
No, I didn't read anything more "in depth" other than Coon's "Races of Europe" (and even then it wasn't that much) and I don't care enough to read more. To me, phenotypes are fun and somewhat interesting and that's it, but I don't care enough to go all in on them, I care more about genetics than that and I have better things to do, so the physicalanthropologywiki.fandom.com and the http://humanphenotypes.net/ are already good enough for me, for the most part.

[Eurafricanid]

Phenotypes are bullshit, but they do exist to represent a look. Doesn't mean anything. It's just an outward appearance. You can be atlantid from Italy, Serbia and even Turkey and have nothing to do genetically with atlantic peoples. That all said, I do dislike the atlantid look in guys cos it's unattractive and very white american ughh! They approach the med look (which is hot) but fail at it. I know other girls dig the whole ''sexy atlantid dude'' look. Dark hair, blue eye combo do nothing for me.



Yeah, this ain't for me...

Atlantids aren't exclusively blue eyed though, and generally people outside of the Atlantosphere (France, (Northern) Italy, Switzerland and (in lower numbers) the British Isles, Spain and Portugal) might have the light eye-dark hair combination and not be Atlantid (aka North Pontid+Pontid, Dinarid (Med)+Norid and all those similar mixes), though, any place where Atlanto-med and Nordid meet an Atlantid look could be formed, it's just not as common outside of the Atlantosphere.

[Septentrion]

Phenotypes are bullshit, but they do exist to represent a look. Doesn't mean anything. It's just an outward appearance. You can be atlantid from Italy, Serbia and even Turkey and have nothing to do genetically with atlantic peoples. That all said, I do dislike the atlantid look in guys cos it's unattractive and very white american ughh! They approach the med look (which is hot) but fail at it. I know other girls dig the whole ''sexy atlantid dude'' look. Dark hair, blue eye combo do nothing for me.



Yeah, this ain't for me...

Phenotypes are not bs!! We recognize people by their phenotype and differentiate people from the others by phenotype as well. Some people like Atlantid and others don’t all. You are more swarthy, Med-looking fellas.

[lei.talk]

I'm tired of this, already!

No, I didn't read anything more "in depth"
other than Coon's "Races of Europe"
(and even then it wasn't that much)
and I don't care enough to read more.

To me,
phenotypes are fun and somewhat interesting
and that's it,

but I don't care enough to go all in on them,
I care more about genetics than that
and I have better things to do,

so the physical anthropology wiki
and the humanphenotypes.net are already good enough for me,
for the most part.

please,
do not feel obligated to respond to posts
which are intended to improve the knowledge-base
of thousands of serious readers in the future.

we understand that the average poster
is here as a distraction from a life of banality:

Otherwise
you'd just be sitting in Boringtown

at the Mundane Pub

nursing a lukewarm stein
of Blandness.

just as verifiable knowledge from my posts
will propagate over time,

the corruption spread by merely parroting
the baseless opinions of one's e-peers

(who are - in turn - merely echoing the baseless opinions
of their e-peers - who quote a face-less poseur
that never read the text or any scientific papers)

while making no attempt to validate such claims
which would create personal knowledge...well, for example —

every principle and detail on this page is incorrect:

On this site, five categories of relative trunk length are used: hypermacroskelic (very great relative trunk length, very short relative leg length), macroskelic (great relative trunk length, relatively short legs), mesoskelic (average relative trunk length, legs of medium length), brachyskelic (short relative trunk length, legs of long length), hyperbrachyskelic (very short relative trunk length, very long legs).

tens of thousands
think they acquired information on that page

only a few thousand will read this refutation:

tell us you slept through greek class — without saying "I slept through Greek class."

---

Originally Posted by Donhueas A bit brachiskelic.

Snapdragon Brachyskelic means long-legged, right?

Donhueas Yes.

skelic index (from Greek skelos = leg):
an anthropometric index consisting of the ratio of the length of the leg to the length of the trunk
multiplied by 100

brachyskelic (from Greek brachy = short):
having legs short in proportion to the trunk — having a skelic index of 75 to 80

mesatiskelic (from Greek mesati = medium):
having legs of moderate length in proportion to the trunk — having a skelic index of 85 to 90

makroskelic (from Greek makro = long):
having long legs in proportion to the trunk — having a skelic index of 95 to 100

which only begins
to address the errors on that page.

consider how many novices
were miss-informed by this image:

the moderator on that wikia
(who should be greatly respected for his prodigious efforts)
responded constructively to my informative comment
at the bottom of that page.

both ratatoskr and eoraptor360 have produced a value-able resource
which required long effort. neither source is infallible.

a responsible reader of those resources
will validate the details — thereby creating personal knowledge.